Major Infatuation: Economics

Tell us why you love your major.


“Economics is a way to learn about people: how we think, how we make choices, and how we maximize happiness. With every class I become more analytical, perceptive, and inquisitive. It is a major that transforms your worldview.” 

Chikaneme Orioha ’21,
Double major in psychology

“I can’t think of a single topic that economics can’t explain in some fashion. Whether it’s health care, politics, or even secondary education, economics concepts are critical to understanding today’s society.” 

Mohammed Mumtaz ’21,
Double major in medicine, science, and the humanities

“Economics allows us to study human decision-making on very small and very large scales, providing answers to questions like ‘Is my college tuition a good investment?’ or ‘How does the U.S. stock market affect the global economy?’ It has taught me that there are complex trade-offs in any choice we make and, most importantly, that there is no such thing as a free lunch.”

Tess Snyder ’21,
double major in applied Math (whiting school of engineering)

“Economics helps me better understand how the world works. Having a background in economics will be vital in my public health career. It is a great way to think about solving many of the world’s problems and understanding economics can help you come up with better and stronger solutions.” 

—Jeremy Costin ’21,
double major in public health studies

Five Questions: Kevin Shollenberger

Kevin Shollenberger, vice provost for student health and well-being [Photo: Howard Korn]

Kevin Shollenberger was appointed Johns Hopkins’ inaugural vice provost for student health and well-being in August 2019 after serving as vice provost for student affairs since 2013. In this newly created position, Shollenberger coordinates all wellness, mental health, and primary care resources for students and trainees across the university, and provides oversight of the Office of Student Disability Services.  

How does Hopkins support student health and well-being? 

We’re taking a holistic approach—very much a public health model—that is not only about providing counseling and primary care clinical services, but also looking at environmental and cultural factors and offering education and skill building. So, everything from looking at policies that might create unintentional barriers for students seeking support, to what food we’re serving in the dining hall, to providing spaces that encourage well-being, like the expansion of the rec center. 

What are our areas of greatest need? 

Students are not necessarily aware of the tremendous resources and expertise across the university. So we created wellness.jhu.edu so students can search for resources under one site. Our Instagram account is picking up traction. And we are increasing access to care with new drop-in counseling hours and expanding services for greater equity.  

What are some of the most innovative initiatives? 

We have been adopting technology platforms that provide tools and skills, connect students to resources, and can serve as a supplement to therapy. Two years ago, we adopted the Calm App, and we have over 7,000 active users. We just launched SilverCloud, an online behavioral health support platform that covers topics including sleep, resiliency, stress and anxiety, and mild depression.  

Is greater attention to student well-being part of a larger trend?  

Most universities have seen an increased use of mental health programs and services as well as students self-identifying as having more mental health challenges. Part of it is reduced stigma around mental health, so people are more willing to come forward. This generation is also experiencing a lot of pressures, from financial to the effects of social media. 

I’m thrilled that we are taking responsibility for these goals as a community, creating a culture of care where we prioritize our own well-being and relationships with others.  

Field Notes: Ballot Boxing

photo of Aarushi Krishnan
Aarushi Krishnan sorts through suffrage artifacts in Johns Hopkins Sheridan Libraries Special Collections room. [Photo: Mike Ciesielski]

With the passage of the 19th Amendment a century ago, states were barred from denying voting rights based on sex. But it wasn’t easy. Decades of bruising battle preceded passage as those who wanted women in voting booths squared off against those who didn’t. And if you think all women were suffragettes, think again: Many women were among those stridently opposed to their sex participating in the political process. This certainly surprised first-year student Aarushi Krishnan, who’s been studying the period through a Sheridan Libraries Special Collections Fellowship. “It seems completely contradictory to what women should want—illogical,” she says. 

Special Collections possesses an extensive assortment of ephemera—books, flyers, posters, and such—relating to the suffrage movement. Krishnan, double majoring in molecular and cellular biology and Writing Seminars, saw the fellowship as a chance to “research something completely outside of what I’m studying,” and plunged into the holdings. Upon discovering that women were among the anti-suffrage forces, she made their views and efforts a focus of her research, which will culminate in a paper with the current working title, “Suffering through Suffrage.” 

Why did some women prefer to limit their own rights? Krishnan found that some were content with the gender lines and roles as they existed. “They were comfortable being homemakers and taking care of the men and felt they didn’t need the rights,” she says. “And there was the idea that they might lose something—femininity and tenderness.” But some educated women working outside the home were also in the anti-suffrage camp. “They felt that having the right to vote diminished their value and wouldn’t change their lives anyway,” Krishnan says. 

Among the more interesting cases is that of Phoebe Couzins, one of the first woman lawyers in the country and a feminist trailblazer who switched from being pro- to anti-suffrage. Krishnan feels this switch had to do with burnout from the struggle and clashes with younger suffragettes. “I would compare it to how third-wave feminists came into conflict with traditional feminists,” she says.  

Krishnan describes the fellowship’s opportunity to get up close with a little-known aspect of American history as “invaluable and captivating.” And there were other lessons as well, such as the value of taking a deep breath and earnestly trying to consider other political points of view—even anti-suffrage views. “I could never see myself siding with them, ever,” she says. “But I do better understand where they’re coming from now.”  

Field Notes: Chinese Characters

Senior Writing Seminars major Alan Fang says he has been trying to write a novel since he was around 10. He describes the plot of an early effort as “a bunch of white 12-year-olds who have to save their town … kind of like [TV’s] Stranger Things.” But this was when the first-generation Chinese American was growing up in a homogenized New Jersey suburb. After immersing himself in the more culturally diverse landscape at Johns Hopkins and joining the university’s Inter-Asian Council, his literary aspirations have become more ambitious and focused. Now he aims to produce Asian American literature.  

photo of Alan Fang '20
[Photo: Mike Ciesielski]

Fueled by a Woodrow Wilson Research Fellowship, which helped him travel to writing workshops across the country and conduct research in Hong Kong, the novel taking shape on his computer is an interconnected, intergenerational affair cutting across pivotal moments of Chinese history—the Cultural Revolution, the Tiananmen Square uprising, and the Hong Kong protests—to culminate in the near-present and a hardscrabble immigrant lodging house in New York’s Chinatown. His working title: Leave Into the Night. 

“The characters are kind of taking a chance walking into the darkness hoping that they’ll emerge somewhere better,” says Fang. “I want to explore what it means to be exiled—to leave a city or a country—and return to it years or decades later. How do you survive between nationalities and cultures?” 

In January, he traveled to Hong Kong where he met with writers’ groups and got firsthand exposure to a city riven with protest, which provided valuable insight for one of the characters in his story. While tensions had ratcheted down from the previous summer, he did see “police lining the streets with shields, guns, and cameras used to identify people.” Given his youth, the authorities viewed Fang with suspicion, and he was stopped and searched one morning just leaving his apartment. Drawing comparisons to New York City during the stop-and-frisk era, he says, “That didn’t affect me or my family. But now I can better understand how someone feels when you’re always afraid of being stopped by authorities.” 

Fang hopes to have a draft version of Leave Into the Night finished this spring when, theoretically, he could start looking for publishers. But then he’s quite realistic about what it might take to get a first novel on store shelves, saying: “I might need to spend five years just polishing it.” 

Field Notes: Fluid Movement

Valerie Gomez ’21 studies multiciliated cells in the the Holland Lab led by Andrew Holland, associate professor of molecular biology and genetics at the School of Medicine. [Photo: Mike Ciesielski]

When it comes to moving fluid around the body, the heart is, of course, the undisputed champ. But look closer—a whole lot closer—at the cellular level and you’ll find multiciliated cells, or MCCs. These cells have scores of hair-like protuberances called cilia that undulate in unison to propel fluids across tissue. MCCs exist in various parts of the body, including the respiratory system, where they help mucus remove trapped particles. 

Almost all vertebrate cells have one cilium that largely functions as a sensory device, like an antenna. Researchers want to understand the mechanisms that cause MCCs to create thickets of these protrusions. Besides furthering an understanding of basic biology, such knowledge might also lead to interventions for cilia-related diseases, such as hydrocephalus (aka fluid buildup in the brain). 

Pivotal research in this area, conducted in a Hopkins lab led by Andrew Holland, associate professor of molecular biology and genetics at the School of Medicine, was published recently in Nature Cell Biology. Among the dozen or so researchers listed as contributors to the article is molecular and cellular biology major Valerie Gomez ’21, who has been working in the Holland Lab since her first year. “For an undergraduate student like me to be in this very highly regarded journal is just amazing,” Gomez says.  

Before there are cilia there are centrioles, structures within cells that form the base upon which cilia are built (think hair follicles). “In the paper, we wanted to understand how these multiciliated cells amplify the centrioles so that they have so many of them,” Gomez says. Protein structures found only in MCCs known as deuterosomes are thought to play a role in this amplification process. The lab created a mouse genetically modified to lack dueterosomes, and then counted and measured its MCCs. It was Gomez who did much of the counting. During 10- and 12-hour days last summer, she stared at an electron microscope image of mouse MCCs and used software to measure the cilia length in microns. (For scale: cilia are about four microns long, while a human hair is around 75 microns thick.)  

The findings: The modified mice had no appreciable difference in the quantity or quality of their MCCs. The researchers’ understanding of cellular dynamics expanded even as more questions arose. That’s often how science works. And Gomez, though thrilled to play a part, sees medical school and not continued cell-level research in her longer-term future. “I really want to go into the neonatal intensive care area,” she says. “But, I guess I am sticking with the small theme.” 

Field Notes: Future Imperfect? Gender in the Genre

It’s fairly safe to say that segments of American society are still grappling with understanding the gender identity movement, which challenges the “you’re-either-this-or-that” gender construct. And yet, over 50 years ago, writer Ursula K. Le Guin envisioned a genderless alien society in her landmark work The Left Hand of Darkness.  

[Photo: Mike Ciesielski]

“A lot of sociological innovations and technological innovations have been preceded by being thought through in science fiction,” says junior Writing Seminars major Dominique Dickey. “That’s a really valuable function of the genre: to serve as a playground for concepts that we aren’t ready to explore in real life yet.”  

But still, as sci-fi boldly goes into brave new worlds, how much baggage from the old one comes along for the ride? After all, in Le Guin’s groundbreaking work, the default pronouns are he/him, suggesting masculinity as the norm. “Is it possible to shed concepts that are so innate—like sex and gender and race and colonialism?” Dickey asks.

“How do you create worlds without those things if we’ve only lived with those things? That’s what draws me to science fiction and the question: When you create a new world, how much of our world can you consciously reject?” 

—Dominique Dickey

Dickey, who identifies as nonbinary and uses gender-neutral they/them pronouns, is working on a book project titled Gender and Genre: Science Fiction from a Nonbinary Perspective. A Woodrow Wilson Fellowship has enabled them to “keep a finger on the pulse of what’s new in science fiction” and travel to a number of science fiction conferences, including the World Science Fiction Convention in 2018 and last year’s Science Fiction Writers of America’s Nebula Conference. Dickey’s book will feature a selection of critical essays analyzing science fiction texts and personal essays on Dickey’s own experience seeing or not seeing themselves in the genre. 

“I like asking other marginalized people for texts that are important to them and for experiences that they’ve had that are linked to them,” Dickey says. “And then, just using that as fodder for building my own experiences.” 

Dickey feels science fiction worlds are getting more diverse, in part because more diverse authors are getting published. Dickey also realizes it might be impossible to create perfect worlds on the page, as some conflict might be necessary because it’s often what makes a good story. “But, you get to a point where you have to wonder,” Dickey says, “that if we can’t imagine equality and altruism in fiction, how are we to reconcile with those concepts in real life?” 

Change of Pace

Between the fall and spring semesters, Johns Hopkins offers Intersession. Students can take one or two courses, graded pass/fail, which are typically not offered during the regular semester.  

Students are often drawn to Intersession as an opportunity to explore new fields and interests, as well as the chance to spend more unstructured time getting to know Baltimore. For example, Intersession’s B’More Program offers one-week courses for first-year students. The courses are designed to immerse students in Baltimore, connecting them with civic and cultural resources through opportunities to contribute during social and service activities. Students often form lasting bonds during these courses. 

By the Numbers: Intersession

  • 175 courses 
  • 2,020 students
  • 18 courses held abroad
  • 13 years for the B’More Program
  • 19 interdepartmental courses

What Are You Reading?

Sharon Achinstein, Sir William Osler Professor, English 


book cover image

We That Are Young by Preti Taneja brilliantly sets King Lear in modern India. The title is from the final lines of Shakespeare’s play, its main characters the next generation—the daughters, the sons—maimed by histories both national and personal. Here are all the paradoxes of new wealth and hideous inequality: booming malls, spas, and mansions, enclosed estates where peacocks roam, and the impoverished slum-dwellers who service these. Cordelia is an ecowarrior, and, of course, there is a storm. I loved every minute of this smart novel: It tells a great story that also asks who tells the story, who shapes history?” 


headshot of Alexandre White

Alexandre White, Assistant Professor, Sociology


“It may not be a big departure from what I research on a daily basis, but I am reading Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s The Last Man. It’s an amazing book. It’s a gothic science fiction novel that imagines a deadly pandemic that emerges in the latter half of the 21st century at a moment when the British Empire is at its collapse. Despite being written in 1826, it feels very prescient at the moment. A feminist, futurist approach to thinking about global epidemics is one that is so deeply critical today.” 


Stephen Fried, Assistant Professor, Chemistry 


“I am reading Locke Key, a graphic novel by Joe Hill and Gabriel Rodriguez. The sprawling tale begins with the Locke siblings moving back to their ancestral home following the mysterious murder of their father. The Victorian mansion houses magical keys that open doors into new worlds and possibilities … but which are also sought by nefarious forces. 

As a scientist, I have always found fantasy and science fiction incredible avenues to express wonder, curiosity, and excitement about ‘what is not yet, but could be someday.’ These feelings have motivated the greatest scientists, and are no doubt also responsible for our most treasured and memorable works of fiction.”  

More Faculty Books

book cover image

Influx and Efflux: Writing Up with Walt Whitman  
By Jane Bennett
Political Science
Explores how we think about human agency in a world with powerful nonhuman influences. 

book cover image

Advances in Noncommutative Geometry: On the Occasion of Alain Connes’ 70th Birthday
Co-edited by Caterina Consani
Mathematics
Illustrates new concepts and methods in the subject of noncommutative geometry.

Israel Under Netanyahu: Domestic and Foreign Affairs
Edited by Robert Freedman
Political Science
Evaluates domestic politics and foreign policy under Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Birth of Intelligence: From RNA to Artificial Intelligence 
By Daeyeol Lee  
Psychological and Brain Sciences 
Addresses differences between biological and artificial intelligence to prepare for future society and technology.

Bastards and Believers: Jewish Converts and Conversion from the Bible to the Present 
Co-edited by Pawel Maciejko  
History
Highlights the histories behind the concepts of the convert and conversion. 

Flourish  
By Dora Malech
The Writing Seminars
A collection of poetry with themes of thriving, growth, innovation, and survival. 

The Shore 
By Christopher Nealon
English
Five poem-essays that explore the complexity of contemporary life.

Badges Without Borders: How Global Counterinsurgency Transformed American Policing
By Stuart Schrader
Sociology
Offers a new account of the War on Crime, “law and order” politics, and global counterinsurgency, revealing connections between foreign and domestic racial control.

The Divine in Modern Hebrew Literature: Conceptions of the Divine  
By Neta Stahl 
Modern Languages and Literatures  
Explores the qualities that 20th-century Hebrew writers attributed to the divine. 

Never Trump: The Revolt of the Conservative Elites 
Co-authored by Steven Teles   
Political Science  
Provides a window into the motivations of committed partisans who chose to break ties with their longtime comrades in arms. 

On Being Me: A Personal Invitation to Philosophy 
By J. David Velleman 
Philosophy  
Explores how we can better understand the most fundamental parts of ourselves by relying on our own powers of thought. 

Static in the System: Noise and the Soundscape of American Cinema Culture 
By Meredith Ward  
Film and Media Studies  
Analyzes the relationship between aural cultural history and cinema’s sound theory. 

Works in Progress: Samuel Spinner

Preserving Jewish Past

photo of vintage Hebrew letterpress fonts
Courtesy of yiddishbookcenter.org

As Samuel Spinner was researching his first book, Jewish Primitivism, which will be published next year, he occasionally came across references to books that dealt with Jewish life during the time of the Holocaust. 

The texts did not fit his immediate project, which focused on understanding Jewish identity in modern Europe. Yet something about them prompted Spinner, an assistant professor of Yiddish language, literature, and culture in the Department of Modern Languages and Literatures, to note the references might work for another project in the future. 

Among the references he found: a stunning series of 175 books, published in Buenos Aires between 1946 and 1966. They were all in Yiddish, a language commonly associated with Jews of central and eastern Europe. 

“It was far from uniform really, something of a grab bag,” he says of the series. “Memoirs of growing up in a small town. Memoirs of concentration camps and death camps. Books of poetry. Novels. Literary criticisms. On and on and on. 

“The only thing uniting all these books was they were all in Yiddish. But even that wasn’t entirely true. There were a couple that had been translated into Yiddish.”

Samuel Spinner

Spinner, who purchased most of the 168 of the series’ texts he owns from the Yiddish Book Center in Massachusetts.  

Spinner wondered who had edited such a large and diverse collection, why it had been published, and what audience the books were intended to attract.  

He learned the editors were originally from Poland and were probably part of a large migration of Jews from central Europe to Argentina that followed earlier migrations that began in the late 1800s. A robust Jewish community already established in Argentina meant potential financial support and a readership for the books, he says. 

The series may have been an attempt to preserve what Jewish life had been like before their communities were obliterated, and six million Jews murdered by the Nazi regime after it came to power in 1933. 

The texts from Buenos Aires, and the other works Spinner has come across, form the foundation of his next book. He has been awarded a fellowship at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum’s Jack, Joseph and Morton Mandel Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies in Washington, D.C., to work on the book, which he has tentatively titled Museums of Words: Holocaust Museums and Literature

Spinner sees his book as combining “these disparate parts brought together to do a larger program like museums, with their different rooms and floors, having one larger, overarching purpose.” 

It is a lot to organize, confesses the native of Canada, whose mother was a med student at Hopkins when she met his father, then chief resident in psychiatry at Johns Hopkins Hospital. “I can’t give you a finite end date. Hopefully, the book will be done, in some shape or version, about three years from now,” he says.  

“But it is not a slog at all. I am really enjoying it. Everything feels fresh,” he says. “It’s fun. I feel energized and excited about it.” 

Considering What Might Have Been

When Andrew Miller was writing a book about the desire of literary characters to become someone new by imitating an exemplary figure, he found himself dogged by another question: What if I had been someone else? 

“It was a period in my life when a number of very important events had happened,” says the professor and director of graduate studies in the Department of English. “I had gotten tenure. I had married. Our first child, Sophia, had died shortly after she was born. Then we had two more children, Cass and Ben. 

“I realized all of these events meant I had started down a long path—marriage ‘til death do us part,’ working as a professor until retirement, parenting.

Miller knew that these sentiments were present in works by Henry James and Virginia Woolf, but the more he thought about it, the more he saw such preoccupations in many other novels, poems, and films.  

He finished the book he was working on—The Burdens of Perfection: On Ethics and Reading in Nineteenth-Century Literature, which came out in 2008—and began a new project. The result is On Not Being Someone Else: Tales of Our Unled Lives, just published by the Harvard University Press.  

Though James and Woolf set Miller on this particular path, he picked as his foundational text the Robert Frost poem “Two Roads Diverged in the Woods.”  
 

“Frost was inescapable,” Miller says. “It is both a text that readers will know well, but also one that is a lot more interesting than a lot of readers think. It is also a very economical way of providing the structure of the book—the two paths, the looking back, the comparing of two options.” 

Miller then moves on to James and Woolf. In the short story “The Jolly Corner,” James’ main character Spencer Bryden has, like James, left his native New York for life in London. When he returns to his boyhood home, he encounters a ghost who is essentially the person he might have been had he stayed, had he opened “the unopened letter of his unlived life” instead of throwing it into the fireplace still sealed. 

In Mrs. Dalloway, Woolf tells of one day in the life of the title character as she prepares for and then gives a dinner party, all the while contemplating the choices she has made in her life, particularly in her marriage and other relationships—mostly with people at the dinner—and how it all might have been different. 


It was a time that made me wonder, ‘If only this or that had happened differently, I would have been someone else.'”

—Andrew Miller


Woolf, herself, “really lived this story,” Miller says. “In her diaries, her short stories, her novels, in the way she experienced much of her life with her sister, with other writers, you see her constantly comparing who she was to who others were, who she was to who she might have been.” 

Miller goes from there to many different works, with particular focus on Carl Dennis’ poem “The God Who Loves You,” Frank Capra’s film It’s a Wonderful Life, and Ian McEwan’s novel Atonement

Along the way, he writes of his own life, musing about what was and what might have been, of watching children grow and make choices not realizing that they are taking irreversible paths as surely as Frost’s character was in that yellow wood. 

“I don’t pretend that the book is exhaustive,” Miller says. “It is the reverse of that. I wanted to write it in such a way that readers are encouraged to think of their own examples.” 

And you do: in Jay Gatsby if Daisy had loved him years before; Charles Foster Kane if he had kept taking Rosebud down that snow-covered hill; Willy Loman if he had gone with his brother to Alaska; Private Ryan if he was the one under that tombstone in the Normandy cemetery. 

Indeed, once Miller makes you aware of this theme, it seems so basic as to be almost ubiquitous. 

“That’s what I liked about the challenge of this book,” he says. “I was trying to write about a topic that both seemed obvious, perhaps too obvious to say anything about, but also, at same time, deeper than I had words to describe. 

“My hope for this book is that people will feel the value of reading closely, not just texts, but the world around them, discovering again that it contains more than they had thought.” 

Works in Progress: Marina Bedny

Seeing with the Brain

Illustration: Brian Stauffer

When an area of the brain can’t be used for its original purpose, what happens to it? 

Researchers have known for a while that the brains of blind people “recruit” the visual cortex for other purposes, but they didn’t know whether those purposes were the same for everyone or varied from person to person. 

In a recent paper, cognitive scientist Marina Bedny and colleagues showed that the purpose is very similar across most blind people, indicating the existence of an organizing system responsible for the repurposing process. They also found that the visual cortex region’s activity was related to making meaning from language, suggesting that it is being repurposed for higher-order functioning. 

“These data suggest the region is doing something more complicated that has something to do with meaning and language,” says Bedny, noting that this is not the first evidence pointing in that direction.  

Bedny and her team are interested in why certain regions of the brain do certain tasks, and whether those roles are influenced more by genetics and evolution or by the individual’s life experience. Studying brains that do not receive the typical input—like those of people without sight or hearing—can offer important insight into that question. “How far from my evolved function can I go?” asks Bedny, an assistant professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences. 

The team presented blind subjects with a variety of auditory input to find out whether their brains repurposed their visual cortices in similar or more random ways. In 65 percent of their subjects, they found correlation in how those regions were repurposed. 

While many brain studies use highly targeted and controlled tasks to understand specific regions and functions, Bedny says there’s a move in science toward using more naturalistic stimuli to better understand how the brain operates in the real world. So her team asked both blind and sighted people to listen to audio tracks from movies—the action thriller Taken and the horror film The Conjuringand a comedic routine from a skit called “Pie-Man,” which is frequently used in brain studies. Sounds included people talking and moving and cars crashing.  

They played the clips three different ways: in their original form, scrambled, and backward, and monitored activity in the visual cortex. What Bedny’s team found especially intriguing was that the blind subjects’ visual cortices correlated most closely with one another during the standard recording, moderately during the scrambled versions, and very little during the backward versions. Those data indicate the presence of an underlying system inherent to the brain’s structure that determines repurposing during those tasks involved with language and meaning. 

The findings are just one stop along the journey for Bedny’s team. The researchers are continuing to dissect the question of which parts of the brain might be repurposed for linguistic versus math functions, for example, in their quest toward a larger understanding of the role of the individual’s experience versus the brain’s anatomical patterns in predicting which parts will do which functions. This focus stems from their belief that the ability to adapt in fundamental ways may be an important part of the human brain in general, as seen when learning skills that force the brain to do things it didn’t evolve to do, like programming a computer or doing highly advanced math.  

Such basic science explorations could one day translate to applications in the treatment of brain damage from stroke or other causes, Bedny says: “Studying plasticity and brain development has huge implications for when to treat brain damage. Can you get someone with brain damage to use different parts of the brain? Can we harness the ability of the brain to retool to help it remediate as a result of damage or disorder?”