“I believe the name ‘Hop-Frog’ was not given to the dwarf by his sponsors at baptism,” Edgar Allan Poe begins.
The protagonist and title character of Poe’s 1850 short story was given his name by a cruel king and his court. Their jester Hop-Frog was the butt of every joke, teased relentlessly about his body, forced to drink wine and wear ridiculous costumes. But then, on what seemed like any other evening of royal excess, Hop-Frog fooled the king and his ministers with his clever wit and—long story short—burned them all alive. “This is my last jest,” he declares, seconds before “his fiery revenge” on the king.
Illustration by John S. Dykes
Classic Poe, one might say… as improbable as it is macabre. But to the well-trained student of literature, one might add: classic 19th-century American.
“I’ve always been fascinated with confidence games and con men,” says Doug Tye, a graduate student in the Department of English and the instructor of the course Social Climbers and Charlatans in American Literature. Tye’s father, a motivational speaker from the Midwest, sparked his son’s curiosity at an early age. “I’m interested in the practice of selling ideas that ‘make you better’… selling a product that doesn’t really exist,” he says. “That’s all tied up in this rags to riches American ideal that leads people to think they can be self-made, from nothing to something.”
That’s also the impetus for Tye’s course: connecting great authors of 19th- to early 20th-century American literature through common themes of rapid social mobility and dubious self-representation. Franklin, Emerson, Thoreau, Poe, Barnum, Twain, and Fitzgerald were all too aware of “the tensions between individual achievement and democratic egalitarianism,” Tye explains. Authors of this period routinely cast their protagonists as self-made, often to a nearly impossible extreme—like the social mobility of Twain’s African-American characters or the rise and fall of Jay Gatsby.
“The biggest thing I want is for students to read a small collection of classic American works,” says Tye. “But they should also see these themes of self-making and self-fashioning, and think about the ways that the character’s cons can be seen as artifice and the ways they can be seen as genuine invention.”
Tye is one of 27 Dean’s Teaching Fellows for the fall semester. They were selected in a competitive grant process within the Krieger School, whereby doctoral students are chosen to teach a course of their design during their most advanced years of study at Johns Hopkins. These soon-to-be professors are given the opportunity to lead small seminars on the very subject that interests them the most, while undergraduates have the pleasure of working closely with a scholar. “This is the fellowship every advanced grad student wants to get,” says Tye, who taught four semesters of Expository Writing and submitted an extensive curriculum and lesson plan in order to garner this fellowship.
“Tye has a very interesting take on the subject matter he covers in class,” says Adam Dec ’15, who took one of Tye’s courses in his freshman year and is currently enrolled in Social Climbers and Charlatans in American Literature. “He takes apart every single detail, analyzes the material so well, and really tries to get everyone involved.”
Surely the irony is not lost on Tye: Like his 19th-century protagonists, he’s also in the business of selling intangible ideas and explanations to his students. “Not all confidence games are crimes,” he’s quick to add. “Sometimes it’s just two people who agree on something and they both get what they want.”
Tye’s class, which is one of eight Dean’s Teaching Fellowship courses that have been waitlisted this semester because of student demand, seems to be precisely what Hopkins undergraduates want.
A faculty roundtable discussion on the economic crisis in Europe…why it started, who it might harm, and how to fix it.
From left: Robert Barbera, Nicolas Jabko, Jonathan Wright, and Olivier Jeanne.
Homewoodphoto.jhu.edu
Europe has a serious debt problem. Countries like Greece and Spain, for example, have too much of it. Banks all over the continent do, too. And leaders of the European Union (EU) and European Central Bank (ECB) have yet to deploy the resources or demonstrate their resolve to keep this financial and economic crisis from worsening. Arts & Sciences magazine sat down with four Johns Hopkins experts on the matter – Nicolas Jabko from the Department of Political Science and Olivier Jeanne, Robert Barbera, and Jonathan Wright from the Center for Financial Economics – to get their opinions on the sources and solutions for what could become the next great global financial meltdown.
Arts & Sciences Magazine: The EU formed in 1999 and gave itself monetary oversight of member nations, but not fiscal oversight. At the time, and since then, many scholars have predicted an economic crisis… so why did it happen anyway?
Olivier Jeanne: I don’t think people really predicted the crisis as it happened. Some people foresaw problems and touched different parts of the beast, but nobody saw the full beast. The crisis has different layers. There is one layer, which is a government debt crisis; another layer, which is a banking crisis; and a third layer, which is a current account imbalance crisis. The theory of optimum currency areas developed by Robert Mundell in the 1960s allowed us to foresee the third layer, the imbalance crisis. But that’s only one layer, and it’s not the one that we are talking the most about now. What we are talking about now is the sovereign debt crisis and the banking crisis.
Robert Barbera: We aspire to worry just about the third layer.
OJ: Yes. The part of the crisis that is probably the least expected is the government debt crisis, the heart of the crisis, and then its implication; the spillovers from that into the banking sector.
Nicolas Jabko: Some people did expect that there would be governments who would not behave, but they didn’t expect that this would trigger a crisis that would spread to the rest of the euro area. The contagion effect is really the part that is the least expected. Because of what happened on the heel of the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, everybody worries about the possibility of contagion. That is why the problem of Greece, for example, becomes not just a problem of Greece but the problem of the entire European Union.
Jonathan Wright: It was clear from 1999 that this was a political project more than an economic one. The precise way it unfolded was something of a surprise, and one thing in particular that I think wasn’t enough on people’s radar screen was the inability of the European institutions to respond to threats to financial stability. So it really is a case of relatively small initial shocks having outsized effects, and that’s always what you get in a crisis. The Greek fiscal problem was not really that big relative to the size of the European economy. Ditto for Irish and Spanish banks. A better designed monetary power—if the ECB was able to function like the Federal Reserve or the Bank of England—would have been in a better position to stop this in its tracks.
A&S: Is there a real chance of an overnight crisis happening again that affects everyday people around the world? Like another Lehman Brothers, caused by a European country or bank?
RB:Yes, it’s possible.
NJ:Everything is possible.
JW:I think it’s more than just hypothetically possible. It’s a real risk.
RB:Europe could have a recession for the next two years, and our exports to Europe aren’t that important. But a financial system meltdown, as we all now know, would envelop the world, including and especially the U.S.
JW:As long as Europe muddles along without a financial implosion, its effects on the U.S. are probably second order, but if you have the devastating financial implosion, that affects the whole world.
OJ: An overnight crisis is possible and could be a good thing, if it compels European authorities to take the right actions. Looking forward a few years, I would give 20% odds on a rosy, near-perfect outcome where Germany makes the concessions that are necessary for the euro area to work properly. I would say probably 60% chance that the euro’s still there in five years, but with most member countries still experiencing low growth—which probably means an increasingly acrimonious euro area with a future that remains uncertain. And 20% odds that a nation leaves or is thrown out of the euro, with the risk that the whole thing collapses.
RB: Greece could leave. Greece could default. Greece could do a lot of things that could cause uncertainty in places like Spain and Italy. It’s suddenly dawning on people that if I have money in Bankia, or some other damaged European bank, I could go to bed at night with 100,000 euros, and I could wake up in the morning with 100,000 pesetas. That’s a bad trade. Whereas if I just take a trip to Frankfurt and put my money in Deutsche Bank, I can conduct business quite comfortably. If I wake up in the middle of the night and all of a sudden Greece or Spain is no longer in the euro, I still have euros in a German bank. This way of thinking invites a bank run, and that is close to happening right now. A bank run, if it arrives, threatens financial markets around the rest of the world.
A&S: There are so many polices, moving forward, that might help the EU avoid this crisis. But if you could prescribe just one or two, what would they be?
OJ: Give power to the EU to go into Greece and collect and enforce the tax code.
RB: Actual tax receipts.
OJ: Mm-hmm. And in exchange for that, participating nations have a monetary backstop from the ECB for the debt of their governments. That is the ECB saying, “I stand ready to buy your debt to limit the interest rates you have to pay.”
JW: The two things that I would do would be to form a European banking union and deposit insurer, a common deposit insurance like the American FDIC that would help prevent bank runs, and then assemble a sovereign debt backstop like Olivier described.
NJ: There are some political answers, too. The problem is to a large extent political, because the reason the Europeans are not able to come up with economic solutions is that they have political problems that they cannot resolve. They know what would work—some sort of joint liability in the form of either euro bonds, which are basically common European debt instruments, or stopgap measures from the European Central Bank. A combination of these two things, plus a banking union—these are economic recipes that would work. The problem is that they would involve a commitment by the different member states to come to the rescue of other member states at a time when their domestic opinions are really not ready for that.
RB: What I think is the real crazy aspect of all of this is that the EU is on this path to destruction, and it is only when the horror of the destruction—and we haven’t talked about that, but it is horror—is front and center that policy makers agree to take steps that they forswore before. It’s always just enough to postpone the inevitable, but not enough to really stem the tide. And if you look, things that they’ve done in the last 12 months, had they done them two years before, might well have succeeded. So it’s always a day late and a euro short. Right now the biggest change—and Jonathan talked about this—is the issue of bank runs. I don’t believe those were an issue 24 months ago, or 12 months ago. Thus postponing big steps means even bigger steps are now needed. The EU now needs the ECB to be the lender of last resort and backstop the sovereigns and some sort of euro-denominated deposit insurance. Deposit insurance will be very difficult to get… I mean, that’s probably treaty changes, right?
JW: Yes.
The above is from an hour-long roundtable discussion between these four Johns Hopkins experts. Stay tuned for the fall issue of Arts & Sciences magazine, where we will run an update to this conversation.
What answer would you give to this Jeopardy-style clue: “it can be as small as a box or large as a build- ing, it can house artistic prints or ancient skulls, newspapers or snake skins, soup cans or sculptures, botanical gardens or miniatures, textiles or mummies.”
How about, “What is a museum?”
That’s the question we tackle in this issue’s cover story. It all started with a formal discussion that dean Katherine Newman initiated last year to discuss the impact of arts education in the 21st century. The seminar featured faculty and students from Johns Hopkins and the Maryland Institute College of Art, with guests from the Mellon Foundation, the University of Chicago, Stanford, and MIT. A dynamic conversation ensued about the role that the arts should play in the curriculum of a major research university.
We thought it would be interesting to take the pulse of the current state of the arts at Johns Hopkins, and share some of our findings in this issue of the magazine. To that end, our cover story explores the opportunities and challenges of museums and the art of display. Erik Ledbetter ’88, founder of a museum consulting firm and executive director of the U.S. National Committee of the International Council of Museums, introduces that article with an essay about the state of museums today and why it should matter to the Johns Hopkins community.
Of course we couldn’t cover everything arts-related at the Krieger school, but throughout these pages you’ll meet students, faculty, and alumni who are dedicated to the arts and who hold a steadfast belief that the arts should play a key role in the higher education curriculum.
Another article you won’t want to miss is our feature on big data. Scientists around the world are amassing mountains of data every day, and managing, interpreting, and applying this glut of information is the next great revolution in scientific discovery…and guess who’s at the forefront of this movement? Krieger school researchers, of course. Writer Mike Field helps us wrap our minds around this emerging field and answers the question, “How big is big?”
And finally, I want to direct your attention to our expansive online version of Arts & Sciences magazine. It’s not just a repeat of the stories you read here in print. We have Web exclusives, such as writer Ian Mathias’ interview with John Guess ’71, who recalls how his time at the Krieger school, during the height of the civil rights movement, inspired his career in the arts. Another story highlights Andrew Rosenberg ’12, recipient of a Provost’s Undergraduate research Award, and his exploration of the political firestorm over same-sex marriage under way in his native iowa. In addition to the Web exclusives, you’ll find Web extras—additional information, photos, and videos—that accompany many of the print articles.
What answer would you give to this Jeopardy-style clue: “it can be as small as a box or large as a build- ing, it can house artistic prints or ancient skulls, newspapers or snake skins, soup cans or sculptures, botanical gardens or miniatures, textiles or mummies.”
How about, “What is a museum?”
That’s the question we tackle in this issue’s cover story. It all started with a formal discussion that dean Katherine Newman initiated last year to discuss the impact of arts education in the 21st century. The seminar featured faculty and students from Johns Hopkins and the Maryland Institute College of Art, with guests from the Mellon Foundation, the University of Chicago, Stanford, and MIT. A dynamic conversation ensued about the role that the arts should play in the curriculum of a major research university.
We thought it would be interesting to take the pulse of the current state of the arts at Johns Hopkins, and share some of our findings in this issue of the magazine. To that end, our cover story explores the opportunities and challenges of museums and the art of display. Erik Ledbetter ’88, founder of a museum consulting firm and executive director of the U.S. National Committee of the International Council of Museums, introduces that article with an essay about the state of museums today and why it should matter to the Johns Hopkins community.
Of course we couldn’t cover everything arts-related at the Krieger school, but throughout these pages you’ll meet students, faculty, and alumni who are dedicated to the arts and who hold a steadfast belief that the arts should play a key role in the higher education curriculum.
Another article you won’t want to miss is our feature on big data. Scientists around the world are amassing mountains of data every day, and managing, interpreting, and applying this glut of information is the next great revolution in scientific discovery…and guess who’s at the forefront of this movement? Krieger school researchers, of course. Writer Mike Field helps us wrap our minds around this emerging field and answers the question, “How big is big?”
And finally, I want to direct your attention to our expansive online version of Arts & Sciences magazine. It’s not just a repeat of the stories you read here in print. We have Web exclusives, such as writer Ian Mathias’ interview with John Guess ’71, who recalls how his time at the Krieger school, during the height of the civil rights movement, inspired his career in the arts. Another story highlights Andrew Rosenberg ’12, recipient of a Provost’s Undergraduate research Award, and his exploration of the political firestorm over same-sex marriage under way in his native iowa. In addition to the Web exclusives, you’ll find Web extras—additional information, photos, and videos—that accompany many of the print articles.
In March 2011, Nolan DiFrancesco, a Hopkins junior who was studying at the American University of Beirut in Lebanon, received a text from a fellow student that classes were going to be cancelled due to rain. But this wasn’t just ordinary rain.
It was radioactive.
Ten thousand miles away, several Japanese reactors were leaking radioactive material as a result of the recent earthquake, and people in the Lebanese capital were panicked. “There was this mass text campaign going around saying that the rain could cause cancer, even though there had been numerous articles that had noted it wasn’t harmful,” DiFrancesco says.
For the international studies major, it was the perfect example of how misinformation and conspiracy theories can spread, like, well, nuclear fallout, in the Middle East. “Conspiracy theories exist everywhere but there’s something about the Muslim world at large where they play a significant role in public debate,” he says. “Information is somehow created to fit a narrative instead of the other way around.”
When he returned to the United States, DiFrancesco, a recipient of a Provost’s Undergraduate Research Award, who had been studying the role of social media in the changing political dynamics of the Middle East for his senior thesis, decided instead to focus on conspiracy theories in the Arab world and the role of technology in spreading them. Specifically, he’s looking into one of the greatest supposed “hoaxes” of them all: the death of Osama bin Laden.
DiFrancesco was in Beirut when bin Laden was killed and witnessed firsthand the reaction of many regarding the news’ veracity. “Some were accepting of what every major news organization was reporting, but a lot of people believed he was still alive and that the Obama Administration was just trying to gain political points. Other people thought that he was already dead and that the Bush Administration had to [falsely] keep him alive in order to justify the war on terror. Others even believed he was frozen away in some U.S. government refrigerator.”
DiFrancesco has been tracking the digital history of the discussion on extremist social media sites in order to plot how the conspiracy theory started and trace the pathways by which it spread. He also hopes to interview members of the U.S. State Department team that is dedicated to combating conspiratorial or other anti-American posts online. “I’d love to see if that program is working or not,” he says.
And, he notes, while many credit social media with fueling the Arab Spring, DiFrancesco believes it can also empower conspiracy theorists. “Social media and new technology in general, for all the promise it holds, just enforces existing political and social conditions,” he says. “If people are inclined to believe in irrational views—even with access to new information—they will. Technology does not change the way people think, but lets them be more active in a discussion that confirms their own biases.”
DiFrancesco ultimately hopes to publish his thesis and someday to return to the Middle East, an area he finds so different than what he expected. “Growing up in the 9/11 generation and seeing images, I always assumed there might be something we might not be getting by the conventional way of looking at things,” he says. “By being there you get a remarkable look at a part of the world that is so often misunderstood.”
It seems that “Lucy” was not the only hominin on the block in northern Africa about 3 million years ago.
Early this spring, a team of researchers that included Krieger School geologist Naomi Levin announced the discovery of a partial foot skeleton with characteristics (such as an opposable big toe bone) that don’t match those of Lucy, the human ancestor (or hominin) known to inhabit that region and considered by many to be the ancestor of all modern humans.
The discovery provides first-ever evidence that at least two pre-human ancestors lived between 3 million and 4 million years ago in the Afar region of Ethiopia, and that they had different ways of moving around the landscape.
“The foot belonged to a hominin species–not yet named–that overlaps in age with Lucy (Australopithecus afarensis). Although it was found in a neighboring project area that is relatively close to the Lucy fossil site, it does not look like an A. afarensis foot,” explains Levin, an assistant professor in the Morton K. Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences.
A paper in the March 29 issue of Nature described this foot, which is similar in some ways to the remains of another hominin fossil, called Ardipithecus ramidus, but which has different features. Its discovery could shed light on how our ancestors learned to walk upright, according to Levin.
“What is clear is that the foot of the Burtele hominin was able to grasp items much better than its contemporary, A. afarensis, would have been able to do, which suggests that it was adept at moving around in trees,” says Levin, who was part of the team led by Yohannes Haile-Selassie of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History and included researchers from Case Western Reserve University and the Berkeley Geochronology Center as well.
The finding is important, Levin says, because it shows that there is much more to learn about the role of locomotion in human evolution.
“This fossil makes the story of locomotion more complex, and it shows that we have a lot more to learn about how humans transitioned from moving around in trees to moving around on the ground-on two legs. This fossil shows that some hominins may have been capable of doing both,” she says.
The fossil, dated to approximately 3.4 million years ago, was discovered in 2009 in sediments along the Burtele drainage in the Afar region of Ethiopia that is now very hot and dry but which the researchers view as having been wetter and more wooded when the Burtele hominin lived, based on its deltaic sedimentary context, results from isotopic studies and the range of fossil animals found near the site.
“We’re just at the beginning of understanding the environmental context for this important fossil. It will be a critical part of understanding this hominin, its habitat and the role that the environment played in its evolution,” she says.
“When I was a freshman, sitting in my room in Griffin House,” John Guess, Jr. ’71 remembers, “I read that line, and it stuck with me. It’s with me to this day.” From the classic 1902 W.B. Dubois essay “Of the Training of Black Men,” the passage was somewhat of a starting point for Guess’ experience at Johns Hopkins and his lifelong appreciation of the arts.
Raised in segregated Houston, Texas, Guess arrived in Baltimore in 1967 during what he gently recalls as “a very special period” in the history of Johns Hopkins University, and America in general. The city was beginning to embrace civil rights and multiculturalism, but was a far cry from desegregated. The same could be said for Johns Hopkins University, which had only recently welcomed its first black students.
John Guess, Jr. ’71 in front of “Fort HMACC,” a contemporary art installation by Otabenga Jones & Associates inside the Houston Museum of African American Culture. The museum’s CEO, Guess commissioned the piece to symbolize the museum’s fight to reestablish itself in the Houston arts scene.
Yet those who came, like Guess, were inspired to hasten Hopkins’ acceptance of different races and cultures. Not far into his freshman year, Guess played a critical role in insisting that the university authorize and recognize a Black Student Union – going as far as occupying the Homewood Museum (formerly used for JHU offices) for a day, when administrators downplayed this request.
That’s the side of his story everyone wants to tell, says Guess. “But what was really the best part of Hopkins for me, as a kid who came from segregation, was being exposed to other cultures and people. I really became cognizant that the African American experience never has, and never will be, impacted by only African Americans.” For example, Guess was the first black president of the JHU Student Government. “There were about 20 or so other black students at the time,” he remembers. “I couldn’t have done that without other people voting for me.”
Thus, ironically during a time of civil divide and turmoil, Guess left the Krieger School feeling culturally broadened. “When I was at Hopkins, the students and professors were very cultural. I was there when people like (poet and musician) Gil Scott Heron and Lowery Stokes Sims (the first black curator at the Metropolitan Museum of Art) were on campus,” says Guess, “and the Baltimore Museum of Art is just sitting right there at the bottom of the place… can’t miss it.”
Guess put his cross-cultural experience to use upon returning to Houston, where over the years he helped grow a family real estate consulting firm. He stayed heavily involved in the arts as well, working to bring significant works of art to lower income communities and garnering board member and leadership appointments at local institutions like the Houston Contemporary Arts Museum, the Houston Arts Alliance, and the Houston Museum of Fine Arts Glassell School.
In 2009, Guess was vaulted further into the spotlight of the Houston arts scene when community leaders urged him to lead the revitalization of a dormant effort to establish the Houston Museum of African American Culture. As CEO, Guess was inspired to take the struggling museum in a new direction, and quickly gained a reputation for supporting contemporary African American artists who transcend race and build a multicultural community – not unlike those who inspired him at Hopkins. “Once you turn on to the fact that everybody has something you can learn from,” he says, the sky’s the limit. “I use the arts to expose people to the fact that we are all Africans. The whole history of man started in Africa. At the end of the day, we’re all the same people.” And true art, to paraphrase Dubois, winces not at the ethnicity of its viewer.
“Social Climbers and Charlatans in American Literature.” “Best Sellers in the Early Nineteenth Century.” “Theft, Theory and Telescopes.” “The Human Microbiome.” What do these intriguing titles have in common? They are all winners of the intensely competitive contest among advanced doctoral students to command their own classrooms as Dean’s Teaching Fellows. Every year, some 60 of our finest PhD candidates vie for the opportunity to teach Krieger School undergrads in a course entirely of their own design. Only a third are given the chance, after defending their syllabi before a team of professors outside of their disciplines.
I recently attended a reception in honor of next year’s Dean’s Teaching Fellows and found myself talking with Doug Tye, graduate student in the English department, about how he planned to approach the subject of “fraudulent pretense” in the writings of Emerson, Poe, Twain, and Fitzgerald. As a social scientist interested in the American obsession with social mobility, I find fascinating the literary preoccupation with projecting a self that is inauthentic. Nick Bujak wants to explore why Sir Walter Scott and Jane Austen were so popular, especially when so many of the classic success stories in literature struggled to make a living in their own time. Jessica Walker, doctoral candidate in the history department, has long been fascinated by the Tudor period in English history, and will take her students through a semester-long examination of the tumultuous changes the “Henry’s” (seventh and eighth) and Queen Elizabeth brought to the country’s religious and political landscape.
These gifted scholars will eventually leave us for assistant professor positions of their own, on campuses other than ours. But for one precious semester, KSAS undergrads will have the chance to work with the best and brightest of our doctoral students. In these small seminars, they explore quirky ideas and deep theory, new frontiers and old legends. It is enough to make me want to go back to school myself.
While the faculty is well aware of the importance of graduate education for the quality of the undergraduate experience, the link is often obscure to those outside of the university. So much attention is placed on how we educate the youngest members of our community, that we often overlook the critical role that the arts and sciences play in training the next generation of scholars.
Graduate students embark on a lifelong calling when they come to Johns Hopkins. They will spend many years, perhaps as many as eight, mastering the intricacies of particle physics or cultural anthropology, econometrics or Latin American history. They become experts in their fields and join the venerable tradition of original research that was born at Hopkins. Their futures depend on how well they are able to dazzle their disciplines through grants, prizes, articles, and book manuscripts.
How can we ensure that this vital part of our academic community is recognized, and that the time our faculty commits to training them is understood as a critical part of the profession? One way we can do this is to make every effort to support these advanced students while they are with us. While none of them would turn down the chance for a higher standard of living, what they truly crave are unique research or teaching opportunities. The art historians need to see the paintings that hang in the museums, churches, and abbeys of Europe. The physics students need to spend time at CERN, home of the Large Hadron Collider that is the birthplace of 21st-century experimental work in their field. Fieldwork in Guatemala or Egypt is essential for the anthropologist.
The Dean’s Teaching Fellowship is another means of exercising the “calling” of a scholarly life. It provides a doctoral student with the opportunity to hone her own voice as an instructor, to puzzle through how she wants to convey the nuances of Caravaggio’s influence on artistic theory, how he conceives of the historical dimensions of the U.S. Constitution, and how all of them can turn those intellectual judgments into rich classroom encounters.
When I speak in public about our ambitions for the Krieger School in the years to come, I often dwell on our stellar faculty – especially our hope to recruit more of them – and the undergraduate experience that is central to our lives. Rarely do I point to the vital community of doctoral students who are, in many ways, at the intersection between them. But we should all understand that what we commit to their training is laying the groundwork for the universities of the future, as well as a stimulating experience for the students of today.
When Donald Koran ’80, MA ’82, PhD, worked in Rwanda from 1999 to 2001, as deputy chief of mission, the second-highest diplomatic post in a U.S. embassy, the country’s 1994 genocide was still a fresh wound. Parts of Rwanda were still dangerous, and at times, U.S. officials had to travel with armed guards.
When Koran returned to Rwanda last summer, this time as the newly appointed U.S. ambassador, conditions were different. “Living in Rwanda today is a pleasant surprise,” he says. Coming back “makes me appreciate the fairly dramatic changes that have occurred since I was last here.” The country is safer, the economy is growing, and the health sector is improving.
But Rwanda is still very much a developing country. That makes Koran, an economist, well-suited to his new role. After completing his PhD at Johns Hopkins, Koran worked at Tulane University, the Federal Trade Commission, and the National Cable Television Association. But he soon realized he didn’t want to focus on narrow economic problems; he wanted a more “varied” career. That desire led him to the Foreign Service. Joining in 1984, Koran has worked all over the world, including Cuba, Venezuela, Morocco, Niger, and Madagascar.
Now as ambassador, he has found the ultimate in varied job loads. “I deal with it all: politics, economics, public diplomacy, consular issues, embassy management, the Peace Corps, military relations, and the whole range of our foreign assistance programs,” he says. On a typical day, Koran may meet with representatives from the Centers for Disease Control to discuss health programs in Rwanda, help an American nongovernmental organization understand legal issues, and tour local businesses making jewelry and crafts that are exported to American markets.
It’s also rewarding to see the country doing better, he notes. “Rwanda has made impressive economic strides since the genocide.” Over the last 10 years, the country’s gross domestic product has grown by an average of 7 percent, managing to expand even during the recent global economic crisis.
“A number of factors have contributed to its success,” he says, “but it largely comes down to attracting resources and using them well.” In addition to effectively using foreign aid—the United States provided Rwanda with more than $200 million in foreign assistance last year, mostly for health-related initiatives—the Rwandan government has instituted economic policies and political reforms that have cracked down on corruption and have made Rwanda an attractive place to invest in and start a business, Koran says. In fact, this year, the World Bank ranked it as 45th out of 183 countries in terms of ease of conducting business.
Rwanda is also making social and health improvements. With better access to health care, for example, rates of childhood mortality under the age of 5 have dropped by half over the past five years. And women have gained greater rights, playing an active role in reshaping the country. The 2003 Rwandan Constitution specifies that women must fill 24 of the 80 seats in the Chamber of Deputies, Rwanda’s lower house of parliament. Today, women exceed that quota, making up more than half of the Chamber.
Given all these developments, Koran says, “a remarkably large number of Rwandans, many highly educated and well-established abroad, have returned to build their country.”
Still, “Rwanda remains a poor country with many needs,” he says. “Rwanda has made great strides in reconciliation since the 1994 genocide, but it is a long-term process, and much still needs to be done.” Rwanda has to find a balance between preventing future ethnic conflicts and allowing an open, democratic political system to flourish. Critics of the government say that Rwanda’s genocide laws, some of which are aimed at preventing ethnic hate speech, limit legitimate political opposition and debate.
But for Koran, Rwanda’s successes are what make it such a “fascinating” place to work. “So much is happening here,” he says. “It’s exciting to watch it and satisfying to be part of it in some small way.”
For some students at Johns Hopkins, the arts are pretty serious business, and they’re determined to turn their passions into careers. It’s no surprise that many of them are accepted to graduate schools to study film, museum studies, digital media, or visual arts. Others use the expertise they gained at Johns Hopkins to land jobs soon after graduation at some rather prestigious places. And a few brave souls venture out on their own in fields such as music and art.
Here are just a few of the places where some of our recent graduates are working and studying:
American Visionary Art Museum
California Institute of the Arts
Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts (National Gallery of Art)
Columbia University
EICAR, The International Film School of Paris
James Madison’s Montpelier
The Jewish Museum of Maryland
Glenstone Foundation
George Washington University
Guggenheim Museum
MoMA
National Postal Museum
New York Philharmonic
New York University
Philadelphia Museum of Art
RocketFuel, a digital media agency
The Spirit Farm, a film collective
University of Maryland
University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Whether you’re a recent graduate in the arts or in the social or physical sciences, we want to know where you’re working, what you’re doing, and how you’re using your Johns Hopkins degree. Drop us a line.
After a childhood that took her from Vienna to Belgrade to Washington, D.C., and Jakarta, it’s only fitting that Marian Smith ’05 would make her career covering the globe. Only now she’s doing it from her desk at msnbc.com in London.
As an editor-producer for the online news organization, Smith has a high-pressure job producing the website’s front page and updating stories about everything from Europe’s economic woes to the nuclear disaster in Japan. “It’s really, really busy, all the time,” she says.
With both parents in the Foreign Service, Smith grew accustomed to moving every few years as a child, changing not just countries but continents. Having at one time or another spoken Serbo-Croatian, Indonesian, French, and Italian, she says with a laugh, “I grew up with this dilemma, where am I from?”
Although she attended high school in London, Smith, now 29, wanted to attend college in the States, and Johns Hopkins was her first choice. “A big appeal of Hopkins was the strong international community,” she says. She pursued a major in international studies until discovering a passion for literature and writing, and changed her major to English. Smith says she especially enjoyed Professor Allen Grossman’s courses on the Bible and Shakespeare.
After graduating from Johns Hopkins, Smith entered an 18-month graduate program in journalism at New York University, with a focus on cultural reporting and criticism. For a time she fancied herself following in the footsteps of film critic Pauline Kael. “I really enjoyed it, but I discovered that I prefer hard news,” she says. She returned to London in 2007 and took a job on the news desk at the BBC. “They were just beginning to integrate all three forms of media: radio, TV, and Web,” she says, “so it was pretty exciting.”
Smith met some people who worked at NBC News and msnbc.com and put in an application there. That began what she describes as a “very long interview process.” While waiting for an opening, she held a couple of other writing jobs, including a stint at the company that publishes Monocle magazine, before getting the call to join msnbc.com in 2010. “It has been two years, and I absolutely love it,” she says.
London is where the globetrotting Smith is finally putting down roots—at least for the foreseeable future. She and her husband, Dan Montalbano, who works for CBS Interactive, recently bought a house there.
When Smith is at work, she and her colleagues are responsible for updating the website to cover world events that occur on their shift. MSNBC, based in Redmond, Wash., has bureaus in New York, London, and Washington, D.C., with the latter focused mostly on U.S. political coverage. Content management duties for msnbc.com are assigned on the basis of time zones, Smith explains.
The team in Washington state covers news that is breaking on their shift, and the London team comes on board at 6 a.m. London time. Seven hours later, the London team hands the reins to their New York colleagues, who pass it back to the Redmond team for the overnight.
Smith described 2011 as an “insane” year for news, starting with the shooting of then U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and including the Arab Spring, several natural disasters, and the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton, which was followed just two days later by the killing of Osama bin Laden. The European debt crisis and the U.S. Republican primary have kept them hopping as well.
And 2012 should be just as eventful, she says, with London hosting both the Olympics and Queen Elizabeth’s Jubilee celebration this summer.
But for Smith, as for any journalist, the pressure and fast pace are part of what she loves about the job. “As much as I stress about it, I think we all get a really big kick out of it,” she says. “And when we’ve done something well, it’s so satisfying.”
Frank Bond ’77 inside the Newseums’s News History Gallery.
Will Kirk / Homewoodphoto.jhu.edu
Standing beneath 12-foot-tall slabs of graffiti-covered concrete, Frank Bond ’77 explains journalism’s role in bringing down the Berlin Wall. Whereas people could not travel across the barrier, information could. “As technology advanced,” he says, “it got to a point where the Iron Curtain could not keep the truth from the rest of the world.”
To design the Newseum’s Berlin Wall Gallery, one of the world’s largest displays of a section of the wall, Bond spent more than a year researching Cold War–era Germany, sifting through newsreels and interviewing American and German journalists and activists who had witnessed the wall’s effects firsthand. Working as a producer at the Newseum—a Washington, D.C. museum dedicated to the history of news and journalism, as well as the importance of the First Amendment—has been a “refreshing” change for Bond, a 20-plus-year veteran of TV news reporting.
“I’m using the process of journalism to find out the ‘who, what, where, and how,’” he says. “But the fundamental difference is, rather than asking people the questions they are guarded against answering, rather than asking people to react to huge trauma they have not processed yet, I [find] myself asking people questions they have thought about their whole lives, but no one had ever asked them.”
Bond’s early inspiration for journalism came from an unlikely source: his parents. His mother was a schoolteacher and his father was one of the first black bus drivers employed by the Baltimore Transit Company in the 1950s. Driving a bus gave his father the chance to enter into a world few blacks ever saw at the time, Bond says. “We would eat dinner together every night, and my father would talk about the things he saw and experienced that day, and that was kind of like a nightly news report,” he says. “I could imagine taking my life experience from my mother the teacher and be a teacher of a different sort on the evening news every night, like my father did at the end of the dinner table.”
At Johns Hopkins, Bond majored in social and behavioral sciences. Sociology and psychology gave him a background every good reporter needs: insight on how society works and how people think, feel, and react.
The social upheaval of the 1970s—the civil rights movement, the women’s movement (Bond was around when Hopkins admitted the first female undergraduates), and the anti-war movement—further influenced what kind of journalist he wanted to be. As one of the few black students at Hopkins, Bond realized many Americans still had few relationships that crossed racial lines. He wanted to tell stories that showed people interacting in new ways and revealed new sides to familiar issues.
And that’s what he did. From 1977 to 1999, Bond worked variously as a cameraman and reporter at WBAL in Baltimore; a correspondent for Gannett News Service, which provided broadcast news to 10 TV stations across the country; and a reporter and anchor at WUSA in Washington, D.C. He reported many memorable events—the Challenger space shuttle explosion, Ted Bundy’s execution, the Oliver North trial, Super Bowl games—and he always tried to bring a unique angle to his coverage. While working for WUSA, for instance, the Monica Lewinsky scandal broke. Thinking like a social scientist, he saw the story as an act of betrayal: Linda Tripp divulged Lewinsky’s biggest secret. He took to the streets to see how Washingtonians handled secrets.
He learned true D.C. insiders keep mum. “I work for the government, I have no personal life,” one 20-something told him. “That’s the inside-the-beltway mentality that I wanted to reveal,” Bond says.
But by 1999, the landscape of local TV news was changing. Economic pressures forced news organizations to make choices “based on the bottom line rather than good journalism,” Bond says. Reporters had less freedom to craft original stories. So it wasn’t a hard decision to join the Newseum.
More than 10 years later, journalism is still evolving. To prepare for the Newseum’s New Media Gallery, which opened in April, Bond began exploring how the Internet, Facebook, Twitter, and the like are changing how people find and share information. In many ways, new forms of media make it easier for Americans to exercise their First Amendment rights, he says. But with greater freedom comes greater responsibility.
“Without gatekeepers, there’s all this information out there,” Bond says. “Your responsibility as a news consumer is to be skeptical, to ask questions, to be in charge of the quality of news that you consume, and not be a dupe.”