Stefanie DeLuca

Stefanie DeLuca, an associate professor of sociology, has spent much of her career studying young people transitioning into adulthood. Currently, she and three colleagues are working on a book that addresses the “college for all” attitude in the United States and its effect on American teens. Here is her quick take on a question that—especially given the state of the U.S. economy—is on more minds than usual:

Q: Is college right for everyone?

A: In America, we tend to think of college as a guarantee. In fact, it’s more like the lottery—but worse. At least when you play the lottery you know your odds of winning. Most kids don’t realize that the odds of winning “the college lottery” are lower than people tell them.

Consider that about 70 percent of American kids attempt college within a year of graduating high school, and the majority do not finish. There is some truth to the benefit of going to college. On average, most students who finish college earn more than those who don’t. But the devil is in the details: You have to finish college for it to really be worth it. What most people don’t realize is that since the 1970s, college completion rates have stagnated. The number of people going to college has increased substantially, but the number that finishes has not.

What’s clear is that if you don’t finish high school, you’re generally worse off than those who do. That’s not news. But what’s surprising is that those who graduate high school don’t look a lot different from those who tried college but didn’t finish. The margins are very close, in terms of gaining full-time employment, owning property, income level, and a couple of other measures of life satisfaction.

We should provide better options. There was a time when high school students had a choice to go through either a vocational education or a college prep curriculum. Now, VocEd has fallen out of favor. It turns out, in a lot of neighborhoods where I do my fieldwork, we have students wishing there was an opportunity to learn a trade in their school—they are dying for it. Instead, what kids have is this push
to go to college at the expense of any other option, and if they don’t finish they are demoralized and unprepared for what’s next. We should help them prepare for both the labor force and for college. You rarely see that anymore.

We also need to change the discourse so it is just not so “verboten” for kids to want to work after high school. And if kids do go to college and don’t finish, let’s make it less penalizing for them with loan forgiveness or job training backup programs.

Stepping up Stipends for Graduate Students

The School of Arts and Sciences will significantly augment the resources devoted to graduate student stipends, thanks to an investment of more than $5 million from the President’s Office over the next five years.

The extra funds will be put to good use in a variety of ways. For example, the George E. Owen Fellowships, which the university awards to exceptionally qualified students, will be increased by $1,000, notes Katherine Newman, the James B. Knapp Dean of the Krieger School. "The presidential contribution is a very substantial addition for which we are immensely grateful," says Newman. "It will help us make our Owen Fellowships on par with the awards offered by our toughest competitors."

Combining funds from the President’s Office and those drawn from the budget of the Krieger School, the basic stipend for all students will be increased by $1,000 a year for each of the next four years. "All of our doctoral students are outstanding and deserving of our support," Newman says. "These colleagues represent the future of the academy and many professions, and it takes years of hard work and devotion to be able to do high-quality independent scholarship."

The School of Arts and Sciences currently enrolls 987 graduate students (not counting those enrolled in Advanced Academic Programs). Newman says that it is exceedingly difficult to find sources of philanthropic support for doctoral students, with some notable exceptions, including Johns Hopkins alumni and institutions such as the Andrew Mellon Foundation, the National Science Foundation, the Soros Foundation for New Americans, the National Institutes of Health, and a set of foundations that provide research funding for dissertations.

The lion’s share of responsibility for graduate support, she says, comes from within the university for the humanities and social sciences, as well as from research grants, primarily in the natural and social sciences.

Exploring Race and Politics through a New Lens

Classes don’t usually make Lauren Berger nervous. As a sophomore, the international relations major has already successfully navigated her way through two years of demanding Hopkins lectures, seminars, final papers, and exams.

But a recent springlike afternoon found Berger walking down 33rd Street in Baltimore toward Greenmount Avenue with a Nikon D3000 in her hand—not a usual classroom experience. Her assignment? To photograph people walking, working, and shopping on a three-block stretch in this predominantly African American neighborhood; to engage them in conversation about the economy, their sources of pride, and their greatest disappointments; and to create photographic portraits that tell stories about race and class and politics.

"I’m not comfortable asking strangers for personal details about themselves," explains Berger, 20. And as part of a class of eight students, most of whom, like her, are white, she and some of her classmates worried about making the people they were photographing feel uncomfortable. However, by the time the group reached Greenmount Avenue, Berger was ready.

Working with two classmates, she spent the next two hours taking pictures of bow-tied bureaucrats and city bus riders, people working behind the counter at the beauty store and walking their kids home from school. She engaged them in conversations about everything from the lack of black-owned businesses on the street, to the political situation in Egypt, to President Obama’s economic policies. "I just don’t think this class would be as meaningful without these experiences," Berger says.

The class, Black Visual Politics—led by political scientist Lester K. Spence and photography instructor Phyllis Berger (no relation to Lauren)—requires photography, but it isn’t an art class. Instead it’s a traditional political science class addressing the politics of black families, the black self, and black spaces that’s combined with a documentary photography class. It’s interdisciplinary and collaborative. Over the course of the semester, students develop an artistic vision and create images in response to lectures and field assignments that are centered on the exploration of the role that images play in black politics. The new class was funded through a 2010 Arts Innovation Grant.

"I’ve always been interested in the power of images to promote and contrast ideas," says Spence, assistant professor of political science. Whether it’s through photographs of "welfare queens," he says, or billboards promoting marriage with dewy portraits of attractive, light-skinned black couples, images can convey emotions like deep disdain or feelings of crisis.

By asking undergraduates to read texts like The Souls of Black Folks by W.E.B. Dubois, and to critique images like Gordon Parks’ 1942 portrait of government char woman Ella Watson, while also creating their own images, Spence and Berger say their goal is to provide a complete picture of what black politics is, and how it works.

"When students make their own work, they really get a much deeper understanding of what they are looking at in popular culture," says Berger, supervisor of the photography program of the Homewood Art Workshops.

Students write papers and take photographs for the class, and their final project, worth 60 percent of their grade, is a 10-piece photo essay that explores a theme discussed in the course.

At a recent class meeting, students worked with their professors to critique a pair of self-portraits they created, one of their "black me" and one of their "white me." The images ranged from a duo depicting a size 9-1/2 hiking shoe and a sexy, black peep-toe stiletto, to a single image of two undergraduates, one black and one white, wearing fraternity sweatshirts that were identical except for their color. "I don’t see my black self as being different from my white self," says Max Dworin ’11, explaining his decision to shoot the photograph of himself (in a black sweatshirt) and his closest black friend (in a white sweatshirt) for his assignment.

The lecture that followed explored the concept of representation, focusing on both its explicit and implicit political elements. Spence projected two photographs, one of four nationally prominent African American politicians in suits and ties, and a second image of the hip-hop artist Nas dressed in a baseball cap with the word "Queens" on the front and a T-shirt printed with a racial epithet. Who did the people in each image represent? What did the word "represent" mean? And what are the political consequences of each image for populations labeled as "black"? Spence asked. The lively discussion connected elements of visual politics (the way black men pose in pictures), with rhetorical politics (the language blacks use in private), and electoral politics (the decision to vote or to abstain from voting).

"I really like how open this class is," says Nicole Petefish ’11, an anthropology major. "You can really say what you want and there’s no judgment. It’s observational. It’s scholarly. And it’s not just sitting around and talking. You have to go out with an artist’s eye and be creative and share with other people."

Dworin, an international relations major, took the class because he’s interested in a political career and was drawn to the idea of "dealing with race in a hands-on way." What he didn’t expect was how the photography aspect of the class would cause him to begin noticing things he had never noticed before.

Just the other day while driving in the city, Dworin saw an older African American man fashionably dressed in a plaid suit and hat, loading a large, dark red American sedan. Something about the scene caught his eye. "It just screamed old-time Baltimore to me," he says. Dworin reached for his camera, but when he realized he didn’t have it with him he was instantly disappointed. "Wow," he thought. "I wish I could take this photo."

Money Matters

Buy a loaf of sliced bread in your local supermarket and the $1.89 price tag is the same whether you are a millionaire or can barely make ends meet.

But that doesn’t mean everyone pays equally. Purchase the bread in Boston and you won’t pay more than the price tag says. But buy it in Birmingham, Ala., or in other areas of the southern United States, and you can expect to pay added local and state sales taxes on food for home consumption that are as high as 12 percent.

One could say that an extra 20 cents is a minor expense, and since everyone is charged this tax regardless of income, it’s fair. But in her new book, Taxing the Poor: Doing Damage to the Truly Disadvantaged (University of California Press, 2011), Katherine S. Newman makes the case that for people with limited resources, such regressive taxes can be devastating.

In the book, which the James B. Knapp Dean of Arts and Sciences co-authored with Rourke O’Brien, Newman argues that these policies reduce the poor’s ability to afford healthy food and safe housing and continue their education. They make an already vulnerable population more at risk for things like obesity, early mortality, high crime, and out-of-wedlock childbearing.

“The reason taxation makes such a difference is that money matters,” Newman says. “If you take money away, if you make people poorer, they have fewer resources to spend on all kinds of things that have a positive impact on such outcomes as high school dropout rates, teen pregnancy, and housing instability.”

A sociologist who has written or co-authored 10 books and has an 11th in progress, Newman has spent her academic career studying poverty and its effects. But it wasn’t until she visited Alabama in 2007 at the invitation of a group called Alabama Arise that she became aware of just how damaging local taxes—used to fund public expenditures like schools—could be to the poor. Alabama Arise’s political campaign to overturn the state and local sales tax on food in Alabama failed, but the experience sparked her interest in this mode of taxation–its history, use, and how it affects people.

She discovered that these regressive local and state taxes date to the post-Reconstruction period following the Civil War, and that although they are widespread in the South, neither their origins nor their impact has been studied. In addition to being a historical study, and a statistical analysis that allows the authors to draw a new connection between local taxes and their effects on the health and well-being of the poor, the book provides a compelling glimpse into the lives of people who are living on the edge.

This is a timely issue that is becoming national in scope. After the passage of Proposition 13 in California, the practice of regressive taxation spread throughout many of the nation’s Western states. Holding down property tax led to increases in sales taxes, and the West is beginning to see impacts on the poor that have been familiar in Alabama for more than a century, Newman says.

“What started out as a South-ern pattern isn’t just Southern anymore,” she says. “It’s a contemporary crisis, because so many states are hemorrhaging financially and looking for any source of revenue that they can find.”

For example, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo is preparing to cap property tax, and in other states where this has happened there has been an increase in regressive taxes, she says. “What everybody needs to know is that if you start digging a hole that’s deeper and deeper for poor people, it leads to outcomes that make it ever harder for them to get out of poverty,” Newman says. “There’s huge temptation to assume this is someone else’s problem, but the long-term damage of changes in tax policy spurred by the Great Recession will be everybody’s problem.”

Casting Call

Can you imagine the Indiana Jones movies without Harrison Ford, or Bridget Jones’s Diary without Renee Zellweger?

Remy Patrizio ’11 could envision, right down to hair color, the female lead for her Woodrow Wilson-funded play. The problem was, she couldn’t find her … and time was running out.

With funding from her fellowship, the Writing Seminars major wrote, and would eventually produce and direct, a play titled Fever Teeth, a mystical coming-of-age story.

The plot centers on Jane, a mid-20s woman, out of work and living with her brother. The brother helps Jane get a job at a dentist’s office run by one eccentric doctor. Jane is tasked with closing the office each night with the explicit orders not to open the contents of the office safe. Jane, of course, can’t resist and inside she finds a jar of extracted teeth with magical properties. Each tooth she handles conjures up the ghost of its owner and she ultimately falls in love with one of these phantoms.

“It’s a story about dreams and what happens when you open up your imagination,” says Patrizio.

She wrote the majority of the script the spring of her junior year. “Any second I wasn’t studying or doing work for class, I was writing,” she says. “I would use index cards to spell out what I wanted to happen in each scene. By the end of the semester I had a ton of index cards scattered on my floor. I was completely consumed.”

During spring break, Patrizio held the first of two casting calls for the 10-person cast. “At the time, I was thinking, ‘What am I doing trying to cast 10 actors?'” she says. “But it was sink or swim—and no way was I going to fail.”

She filled most of the roles, but still no Jane.

With the assistance and support of Joe Martin, a senior lecturer in theater arts at Johns Hopkins, Patrizio ended up with a 50-page script and then began the process of searching for a theater space. She was referred to Links Hall in her hometown of Chicago and booked the space for a four-night run in August 2010.

Before she went home to Chicago, she held another round of auditions to complete her cast. She saw many actors, but none fit the bill. Where was her Jane? Then in May, just three months before the show dates, Jessie Spear showed up–with red hair and endless enthusiasm.

“She was the perfect embodiment of the person I had seen portraying this character and we totally hit it off,” Patrizio says.

The varied bunch of professionals, students, and friends began rehearsing and before Patrizio knew it, Fever Teeth weekend was upon her.

How’d it go? Better than she imagined. All four nights were sold out. “It all came together. I couldn’t have been happier,” says Patrizio, who plans to continue playwriting and to submit her scripts to festivals in Chicago and beyond.

Explore Further:

The Woodrow Wilson Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program awards grants of up to $10,000 to incoming freshmen and up to $7,500 to rising sophomores for original, independent research projects in the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences. Students use the grant throughout their undergraduate careers to pay for equipment, travel, or other research expenses. Here’s what some of the fellows have been doing.

High-Speed Rail: Where…and When?

Four months into his term, President Obama outlined his plans for a high-speed rail system across the United States. His administration identified 10 corridors that showed the “greatest promise” for an advanced transportation system intended to reduce traffic congestion, cut dependence on foreign oil, improve the environment, and spur job growth.

Lester Kao ’11 set out to analyze Obama’s plan and do his own assessment of where new high-speed rail systems possibly could succeed, if anywhere. He began by researching the economic and cultural impact of such systems around the world—in part by riding the rails himself, in Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and throughout Europe.

Kao also conducted interviews with officials at leading rail companies, including Deutsche Bahn in Germany, Eurostar, and Central Japan Railways. And he spoke with pro-rail lobbies in the United States, government officials on the Appropriations Committee in the Senate, railway suppliers in Japan, and a host of business owners and developers. To see things from a user perspective, he conducted a passenger satisfaction survey through interviews conducted aboard trains.

Once all the data was in, the economics major identified America’s Northeast corridor—roughly from Washington, D.C. to Boston—as the area where a high-speed rail system could deliver the most impact. He believes the population density of the region, its multiple economic centers, and positive cultural attitudes toward public transportation make this corridor the best suited for success.

Kao’s next question was: Can we afford it? The costs of constructing a new system are staggering at $50 million per mile, making the price tag for the D.C.-to-Boston line an estimated $18 billion. Associated costs, such as tunnel projects, could push that number many billions of dollars higher, he says.

To help mitigate costs and make the project more palatable to the federal government and taxpayers, Kao recommended utilizing existing right-of-ways and double tracking (using existing rail lines) when necessary. He also considered alterations to current train systems, such as improving overhead electricity systems that power the trains, which in concert with other technologies could increase the average train speed from 85 to 140 mph.

Before he started his research, Kao thought a nationwide high-speed rail system was doable and represented a sound investment in the future.

“That wasn’t necessarily the case, I found,” he says. “It really depends on the region: demographic/population statistics, public inclination toward public transportation, and other factors. We’ve got a lot of pressing transportation issues to take care of in this nation: maintaining our national highway system, our commitment to serve cities too small to receive high-speed rail service. We also have budgetary constraints.”

But he still sees merit in high-speed rail. Around the world, he says, such systems generate on average 1.8 to 2.4 times the investment in terms of economic/development benefits. And they serve as catalysts for regeneration of communities.

“Upgrading our rail systems to make our train systems go faster is a necessary expense if we are to tap into the economic advantages of [connecting] several large metropolitan areas,” he says.

Explore Further:

The Woodrow Wilson Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program awards grants of up to $10,000 to incoming freshmen and up to $7,500 to rising sophomores for original, independent research projects in the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences. Students use the grant throughout their undergraduate careers to pay for equipment, travel, or other research expenses. Here’s what some of the fellows have been doing.

From Cell Proteins to Smoking Cessation

Some Woodrow Wilson Fellows pursue a single topic over several years. Others, like Karthik Rao, spread their research wealth around.

Rao, a public health studies major, started his work at the Johns Hopkins Institute for Cell Engineering during his freshman and sophomore years. In the lab of Valina Dawson, Rao spent roughly a year and a half investigating poly ADP ribose polymerase’s (PARP’s) role in the regulation of cell death in neuronal pathways—work that may lead to the development of novel therapeutic techniques in the neurodegenerative field of medicine.

Rao would have continued with cell work, but then the field of public health drew him in. In summer 2009, to prepare for an upcoming semester abroad in a rural area of South Africa, he used his funding to explore different types and uses of traditional medicines at the Samueli Institute in Alexandria, Virginia.

His independent study project in South Africa centered on analyzing the social dynamics that play a role in the high level of violence in rural areas. Rao spent a month living in the rural village of Eshowe while volunteering and working with doctors at the provincial hospital.

Rao says that the level of poverty he witnessed took him by surprise. On his first day of rounds, he went to the home of a frail woman who suffered from HIV, TB, and high blood pressure. The woman, who lived alone, had medications that were mislabeled; her floor was infested with insects, her windows stood broken in their frames, and her roof was thatched hay with gaping holes. In her kitchen was a wood-burning stove, with crackers the only food in sight.

Emotionally challenging experiences like this one inspired Rao to continue working on international health issues. With the assistance of faculty at the University of Stellenbosch School of Medicine in South Africa, Rao crafted a pilot study, conducted last summer, to determine the extent of tobacco dependence in a sample of adult smokers who are representative of the lower socioeconomic class of South Africans. His study also evaluated smoking cessation interventions.

He concluded that tobacco cessation clinics were vital to the health of South Africans and that implementing them as an intervention in public hospitals has the potential to create lasting benefits for patients.

“What’s been especially rewarding for me is that I have been able to see this project through all phases of its development,” he says. “The success of this project has motivated me to continue with this and work to start our first tobacco cessation program at Tygerberg Hospital, located just outside of Cape Town.”

Explore Further:

The Woodrow Wilson Undergraduate Research Fellowship Program awards grants of up to $10,000 to incoming freshmen and up to $7,500 to rising sophomores for original, independent research projects in the humanities, natural sciences, and social sciences. Students use the grant throughout their undergraduate careers to pay for equipment, travel, or other research expenses. Here’s what some of the fellows have been doing.

Marina Suarez

“When I was in the second grade, we had a dinosaur unit and since then, I’ve never looked back! Finding a dinosaur is something every kid dreams of, so it was really exciting to be the first people to see the remains of animals that have been gone for millions of years.”

Marina Suarez (foreground), the Blaustein Postdoctoral Scholar in Johns Hopkins’ Morton K. Blaustein Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, whose geology work, together with that of her twin sister, Celina, while the two were graduate students at Temple University, helped define a new species of dinosaur. The six- to seven-foot-long raptor-like dinosaur with large eyes and dexterous claws, thought to have lived about 125 million years ago, has been named in their honor: Geminiraptor suarezarum, Latin for “Twin Predatory Thief of the Suarezes.”

Where Arts and Sports Connect… There’s Hope

As the graphic images of the World Trade Center attacks played continuously on TV, a 12-year-old Mohammad Modarres sought to fathom the horror as best he could. He drew. In his picture, the two towers stand pre-9/11, tall and draped in U.S. flags–as flowers, doves, butterflies, and hearts rain down on city streets lined with a heart-shaped populace. “Art is a way that I express myself, so that picture was my way of putting death and grief into my own language. I needed a way to grasp it,” say Modarres ’11 of the picture, which would later be published in The New York Times book A Nation Challenged.

In high school, Modarres went on to establish The Peace Project, a student group that primarily uses art to raise funds for youth development initiatives around the world. Through the project he helped advise a nonprofit sports center for disabled youth in his parents’ native Iran, and later got involved with a youth surfing club in Gaza that united people of different faiths.

For Modarres, his two passions, art and sports, help him make sense of the world around him. Now, thanks to a prestigious George J. Mitchell Scholarship, the public health major will deepen his academic understanding of the role that sports and the arts can play in social and economic development, especially among young people.

One of 12 scholars selected for the Mitchell Scholarship from a nationwide pool of applicants, Modarres will pursue a master’s degree in development practice, a new program funded by the American-based MacArthur Foundation and offered jointly by University College Dublin and Trinity College Dublin in partnership with the National University of Rwanda. Modarres plans to do fieldwork in Rwanda after his studies in Ireland.

At Hopkins, with funding from a Provost’s Undergraduate Research Award, Modarres traveled to South Africa in summer 2009 to work with MonkeyBiz South Africa–a Cape Town-based fair trade organization that uses handicrafts to help finance public health initiatives. There he met the leaders of FIFA’s Football for Hope initiative, a $10 million project in Africa that uses football as a tool for social development. FIFA leaders were so impressed by the young man that they created a new position–program assistant–for him to fill. Modarres took a leave from Hopkins from January through August 2010 to work in Cape Town before and during the World Cup. He assisted in planning and implementing youth-targeted HIV prevention education programs and other youth-led projects focused on combining health education and sports.

His experiences taught him that sports “have the potential to be one of the most effective means of giving disadvantaged communities access to the education they need to prosper,” he says.

Even as Modarres prepares to graduate and head to Ireland, he is hard at work on yet another project: raising money to build an arts and sports community center in Afghanistan.

His World Trade Center artwork has been accepted to the collection of the 9/11 Museum at Ground Zero.

A Boost for Collaborative China Studies

Former Hopkins President Steven Muller first envisioned a Johns Hopkins relationship with China back in 1977. He wanted to replicate somewhere in Asia the success of Hopkins’ Bologna Center, the full-time graduate school in Bologna, Italy, that was established in 1955 by the School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), and Muller viewed China as the ideal location. In his words, it was “the country of the future”—and a burgeoning world power.

Through various starts, stops, and hurdles, his vision in time became reality: In September 1986, the Hopkins-Nanjing Center opened its doors. The graduate student center, operated jointly by SAIS and Nanjing University, was one of the very first joint academic ventures between China and the United States.

Now Johns Hopkins’ connection to China has grown even deeper, with the creation of the Benjamin and Rhea Yeung Center for Collaborative China Studies. Made possible by a $10 million gift from Benjamin Yeung, a pioneering Chinese-American automotive industrialist, and his wife, Rhea, the center will promote innovative new approaches to the study of China. The center is managed from the Homewood campus and falls under the auspices of the Provost’s Office.

In the near term, Johns Hopkins envisions new academic and research initiatives funded through Yeung Center grants for collaborative projects across the institution.

At the Krieger School, the new center represents a boon for the East Asian Studies program, says center co-director Kellee Tsai, vice dean for humanities, social sciences, and graduate programs. She foresees new course offerings on China and the establishment of a study-abroad program in Nanjing for undergraduates. “Before, the Nanjing Center was really only open to graduate study,” she says. The Yeung Center should also make it easier for students to get research funding–previously a major challenge to obtain. “A graduate student here [could] do archival research work in China, even spend an entire year doing fieldwork,” she says.

The East Asian Studies program at Arts and Sciences currently has five full-time faculty, and Tsai believes the Yeung Center could become a strong recruitment tool to attract additional faculty–both full-time and visiting scholars–as well as graduate students and postdoctoral fellows interested in China. Krieger School faculty, through the center, can directly collaborate with their Chinese counterparts.

“This new center provides a venue to facilitate research exchanges with Chinese scholars,” she says. “We can pursue research questions from different perspectives, and design new projects, through workshops and conferences, on emergent areas of intellectual or applied interest.”

The Hopkins-Nanjing Center will be a natural host for some of this activity, Tsai says, but she foresees the forging and strengthening of relationships with other Chinese institutions such as Peking University, Tsinghua Universtiy, Fudan University, and the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

In addition to Tsai, the Yeung Center’s other two co-directors are Mike Lampton, director of the China Studies Program and dean of faculty at SAIS; and David J. Davies, American co-director of the Hopkins-Nanjing Center, a post he currently fills on an interim basis.

“The Yeungs’ magnificent gift will enable us to rethink the way we study and relate to China by fostering new opportunities for specialists in widely different disciplines to work closely together,” said university President Ronald J. Daniels in announcing the gift. “By bringing extraordinary talent from across the university together in this way, we expect to make great strides in the scope and scale of our work in and with China.”

Benjamin Yeung (pronounced “young”) founded the first Chinese company to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange and introduced the Zhonghua sedan, widely considered the first truly Chinese car. The Yeungs’ son, Jack, earned his undergraduate degree from the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences in 2005 and a certificate of graduate studies from the SAIS Bologna Center in 2006.

In many ways, the Yeungs’ gift has brought Steven Muller’s vision full circle.

Celebrating the Arts

Over five days in early April, Hopkins artists of every variety shared their talents at venues across the university. There was acting and dancing on the Homewood campus, storytelling at the School of Medicine, and a recital featuring students from the Peabody Conservatory—and that was just on Friday night.

“What’s really important is that the festival celebrated the arts at several campuses of Johns Hopkins,” says Eric Beatty, director of Homewood Arts Programs and festival organizer. “There is such a broad representation of art forms at Hopkins, and our students, faculty, alumni, and staff [were essential] to each event.”

Over the course of the festival that ran from April 6 to 10, the local community was treated to more than 35 performances, exhibits, presentations, tours, and workshops, with the Mattin Center at Homewood serving as a hub of activity.

The inaugural festival kicked off the evening of April 6 with two simultaneous events: Former JHU Historic Houses director Cindy Kelly hosted a reading from her new book, Outdoor Sculpture in Baltimore, at the Evergreen House. At the same time, Film and Media Studies instructor Matthew Porterfield hosted a screening and Q&A for Putty Hill and Hamilton—his two films inspired by Baltimore working-class neighborhoods.

A sampling of other activities that unfolded over the ensuing four days:

  • The Writing Seminars faculty held a panel discussion on the writing process in the Mattin Center.
  • A group of Hopkins students fashioned a line of black dresses for their “Liberation by Design” project.
  • The JHU Modern Dance Company presented its 30th anniversary spring concert in Shriver Hall.
  • The Barnstormers, Hopkins’ oldest and largest theater troupe, performed three showings of Evita in Swirnow Theater.
  • Peabody faculty member John Walker performed an organ recital at Peabody’s Leith Symington Griswold Hall.
  • The Hopkins medical community got involved by hosting Stories from Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, a part of The Stoop Storytelling Series, at the Turner Auditorium.

“The Hopkins community is very artistic,” Beatty says. “We have the world-class music of the Peabody Institute and the Shriver Hall Concert Series, exemplary Homewood academic arts programs, the Archaeology and Historic Houses museums, the Hopkins Symphony Orchestra, the JHU Press, and dozens of talented student arts groups.

“Art is always part of Hopkins. We wanted to create a five-day event to shine the spotlight on all of our artistic talent.”

Milestones

Owen Martin Phillips, a Johns Hopkins University faculty member emeritus and world-renowned oceanographer, died on Oct. 13 at his Chestertown, Md., home. He was 79.

Phillips was world famous for devising a methodology for predicting and describing the shape of ocean waves, including giant waves–10-story upheavals of the sea surface–the knowledge of which is essential for designing ships and drilling platforms capable of withstanding these destructive swells of water.

An engineer and scientist who probed the complex physics of fluids in motion, Phillips spent half a century at Johns Hopkins and was the chief architect of the school’s Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, formed in 1967. His work in fluid mechanics is widely recognized as having had a profound impact on the field, cutting across traditional disciplines and encompassing practical applications as disparate as the Earth’s crust, its atmosphere, and oceans.

“Owen was a true giant in the field of fluid mechanics for his contributions to oceanography and other geophysical flows, and he had a huge impact on Johns Hopkins University,” says Darryn Waugh, chair of Earth and planetary sciences. “Not only did he play a major role in the formation of the Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, and twice serve as chair, but he also was its first and longest-serving chair, during which time he guided its growth and development into an internationally recognized, interdisciplinary center for research and teaching.”

John P. Doering, a longtime faculty member in the Department of Chemistry, died at home in Baltimore County on Dec. 13 from cardiac arrest. He was 73.

Doering graduated Phi Beta Kappa from Johns Hopkins in 1958 and joined the faculty in 1964 after earning his doctorate at the University of California, Berkeley in 1961 and working for three years at the Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory (now Los Alamos National Laboratory). He became a full professor in 1970. Four decades of Johns Hopkins freshmen studied in chemistry laboratories under his supervision. He also had undergraduate assistants in his labs and classes, was the thesis adviser of at least 11 doctoral students, and worked with numerous postdoctoral fellows.

Doering was a pioneer in the use of rockets and satellites for measurements of electrons in the Earth’s atmosphere, and his laboratory provided electron spectrometers for three Atmosphere Explorer satellite missions between 1970 and 1983 and measured the photoelectron spectrum of the Earth’s atmosphere to a degree of detail that remains unequaled. In laboratory experiments, he studied the excitation and ionization of atoms and molecules by electron impact, and their subsequent energy loss. His determination of the rates of excitation of atomic oxygen turned out to be particularly important in atmospheric chemistry modeling.