Andrei Gritsan

Andrei Gritsan

“What we found may be just the tip of an iceberg, which may have profound implications and explain a lot of unknown things in the universe.”

—Associate Professor Andrei Gritsan
Department of Physics and Astronomy

On July 4, 2012, researchers at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) in Geneva, Switzerland, announced the discovery of a new subatomic particle. By colliding protons traveling at 99.9999991 percent the speed of light, physicists like Gritsan were able to detect the sudden emergence of a particle that contained qualities consistent with the Higgs boson—a particle many believe could answer some of the most fundamental questions about the universe and life within it.

“This is a type of matter or energy that has existed for billions of years but has never been seen before,” explains Gritsan, who led a team of experts looking for one type of the Higgs boson decay (with two Z bosons) at the LHC. “We do not know yet where it will lead us. If this turns out to be the Higgs boson, then this means that everything around us contains fields that give mass to particles, including the Higgs boson itself, even when we think there is nothing there. Even the vacuum of space is no longer empty.”

Such a field could explain the origin of practically everything. In the very early moments of the universe, massless particles mysteriously interacted and gained mass, which formed the building blocks for matter as we know it. The Higgs boson and its field, or whatever Gritsan and his colleagues have found, are likely responsible for this critical transformation. “The whole evolution of the universe depended on this field. Due to this field’s existence, our sun is shining. This field holds us together. Without it, tiny particles in our body would quickly disintegrate, along with the particles of everything else.”

A better understanding of the Higgs boson could predict the future of the universe as well. After all, if this newly discovered field is within us, and within the rest of the universe, will it hold us all together indefinitely? Is the field stable? As is so often the case, by answering one of science’s great questions, Gritsan and the physicists at the LHC have given birth to countless more. “We have a lot of hard work to do,” says Gritsan.

Keeping It Real in a Baltimore Jail

It took only a few minutes for public health major Zachary Athing to discover that everything’s different in jail—even something as mundane as small talk. As a requirement for the major, all students must complete an “applied experience”—80 hours of unpaid work in a clinical or community-based setting. Athing chose the student-led Johns Hopkins Jail Tutorial Project, where undergraduates tutor men and women in the Baltimore City Detention Center. Athing started writing about his experiences.

I thought tutoring in a jail would be easy. After all, once you clear the metal detector and pat-down screening, tutoring is tutoring, right? Wrong. Tutoring in a jail is much more challenging because of the incarcerated students’ complex histories. Some dropped out of high school recently. Others have been injecting heroin for the past 30 years. Some are 18-year-old kids with kids of their own. Others are middle-aged men who have been in and out of the Baltimore City correctional system since they were 14. Connection and communication between teacher and student are always important elements of the tutoring process, but within a correctional setting, it can be difficult.

Zachary Athing outside the Baltimore City Detention Center

Zachary Athing ’13 stands outside the Baltimore City Detention Center, where he tutors incarcerated men.

I joined Jail Tutorial in the fall of 2009 after seeing their booth while I was walking through the Student Activities and Clubs Fair. I decided to join the substance abuse subgroup of Jail Tutorial. We tutor men 18 and up who are incarcerated on drug charges, and their needs vary greatly. Some need help preparing for a GED or SAT exam, while others are reading and doing math at elementary school levels. About 40 men are in the program at any given time. The most common charges are for heroin and cocaine. Because it is a rehabilitative substance abuse program, the men are housed together in a section of the jail, and this is where the tutoring takes place. Three or four men huddle around their Hopkins tutor at a cafeteria-style table. The walls are dull white concrete, and the few windows are barred. The voices and laughter of other men echo in the background.

Before we started, the club leaders repeatedly stressed the importance of “adaptable social interaction.” It was not until my first day of tutoring that I understood what they meant. When the three other tutors and I entered, the first person I saw was a tired-looking man in his 50s, with close-cropped hair and a shadow of a beard. I smiled and said, “Hi, how are you?” He looked at me for a second before he jokingly, but dismissively, replied, “I’m in jail.” I laughed nervously. He was right, he was in jail. It turned out I was not much of an adapter after all, and it hit me: This was not just tutoring.

At the jail I realized that the social toolbox I had subconsciously carried with me for 18 years was suddenly missing a few critical items. Communication is complex. Notably, the simple art of small talk seemed to have no appropriate use within the jail. In fact, it is painfully awkward and difficult. At times I felt completely paralyzed when I met a new inmate without small talk as a buffer. For one, the trusty weather is off-limits because of, well, incarceration. Sports and current events are problematic because television access is limited at best. Asking about the family can make an inmate feel the distance. Small talk associated with saying goodbye is hard, too, particularly during the holidays. When I leave for Thanksgiving break, is mentioning the holiday appropriate when the men will not be eating with family, or they have no family at all? Is “Have a happy New Year” applicable when 2013 will—for them—be largely indistinguishable from 2012, surrounded by the same concrete slabs and musty air? Or is purposefully omitting such good wishes even worse?

Because of these stubborn intricacies, I had to adjust how I interacted when at the jail. I had to check the superficial small talk at the door. Renouncing such a ubiquitous social tradition or norm was powerful and liberating. Yes, both tutor and tutee feel uncomfortable at first. We have next to nothing in common. But we get over it. We defy the complexity of it all. Once we both acknowledge that the uncomfortable social clumsiness is mutual and context-based, we can move on and focus on the tutoring. In many ways, the relationships I form at the jail seem so much more raw. We do not feel the need to impress each other or tiptoe on eggshells for fear we will violate some unspoken social rule. We are real.

Welcome New Faculty

The Krieger School of Arts and Sciences welcomed a talented group of new faculty members in 2012. They each bring scholarly accomplishments to our Johns Hopkins community. Here is a sampling:

Bentley AllanBentley Allan is a new assistant professor in the Department of Political Science. He received his PhD from Ohio State University. His research interests include how scientific ideas transform international politics; international relations, organizations, and development; diplomatic history; and normative international theory.
Jorge BalatJorge Balat is a new assistant professor in the Department of Economics. He received his MA, MPhil, and PhD from Yale University after studying at the Universidad Nacional de La Plata in Buenos Aires, Argentina. His research interests center on industrial organization, microeconomics, and applied econometrics.
Marina BednyMarina Bedny is a new professor in the Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences. She received her PhD in experimental psychology at the University of Pennsylvania, and held postdoctoral fellowships at MIT and Harvard Medical School. Her research focuses on how early visual experiences affect cognition.
Kristina NielsenKristina Nielsen has been given a joint appointment as assistant professor with the School of Medicine and the Mind/Brain Institute in the Krieger School. She received her PhD in physics from the Max Planck Institute in Germany. Since 2006, she has been a postdoctoral fellow at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in California. Her research focuses on the complex networks that constitute the brain.
Anne MossAnne Moss has been appointed assistant professor in the Humanities Center. She received her PhD in Slavic languages and literatures from Stanford University. She has been at the center since 2005 as a visiting assistant professor. Her research interests include Russian Realism and Socialist Realism, film theory, and gender and feminist theory.
Nick PapageorgeNick Papageorge joins the Department of Economics as an assistant professor. His research interests include labor economics, health economics, and the economics of innovation. He received his PhD in economics from Washington University in St. Louis and his MA from Die Humboldt University in Berlin.
Elijah RobertsElijah Roberts joins the Department of Biophysics as an assistant professor. He received his PhD in biophysics and computational biology at the University of Illinois, where he also conducted postdoctoral work. His research interests are in lattice microbes, genetic switches, gene expression, and systems biology.
Steven RokitaSteven Rokita is a new professor in the Department of Chemistry. Most recently an associate professor at the University of Maryland, his research interests include the reactions of nucleic acids, electron transfer in biopolymers, and studies within bioorganic and bioinorganic chemistry. He is a fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and he earned his PhD at MIT.
Yuya SasakiYuya Sasaki is a new assistant professor in the Department of Economics. He received his PhD from Brown University, where he studied theory and application of econometrics. His research centers on dynamic panel data, endogenous nonseparable models, and nonparametric model tests by discrete instruments.
Daniel SchlozmanDaniel Schlozman is a new assistant professor in the Department of Political Science. He was previously a research fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School. He received his PhD in government and social policy from Harvard University. His primary research interest is why American social movements have or have not allied with major political parties.
Brian SmithlingBrian Smithling joins the Department of Mathematics as a new assistant professor. He was previously conducting postdoctoral work at the University of Toronto. He received his PhD from the University of Chicago. His research areas are arithmetic and algebraic geometry, including Shimura varieties and classification problems related to abelian varieties, p-divisible groups, and formal Lie groups.
L. Nandi TheunissenL. Nandi Theunissen is a new assistant professor in the Department of Philosophy. She received her PhD in philosophy from Columbia University and her MPhil from the University of Sydney. Her research centers on metaethics, normative ethics, and Kant’s practical philosophy, with a particular focus on the value of humans.

Krieger School Welcomes Controversial Russian Scholar

“They want to present themselves as the new superpower and continue the myth of the great Russian state. And I’ve learned that you cannot balance imperialistic myths with a model of critical thinking. The regime has more power and influence than the academics.”
—Nikolay Koposov

All Nikolay Koposov ever really wanted was to have a normal professional life in higher education. That seemingly simple desire, however, cost him his job in his home country of Russia and left his professional future hanging in the balance. His offense? Trying to present Russian history in a factual manner.

When Koposov’s American colleague at Johns Hopkins, Gabrielle Spiegel, the Krieger-Eisenhower Professor in the Department of History, learned about his plight, she immediately got to work finding a way to bring Koposov to Johns Hopkins as a visiting professor. As a result of Spiegel’s efforts and support from donors, he is now here for a year, teaching two courses, including Why Putin? The Rise and Fall of Democracy in Russia, 1985-2012, in which more than 70 undergraduates are enrolled.

 Nikolay Koposov teaches

As a visiting professor, Nikolay Koposov teaches a course about Vladimir Putin to more than 70 undergraduates.

As a history scholar and founder and dean of the first liberal arts college in Russia, Koposov was comfortable writing and speaking out about what he saw as the deteriorating political climate in Russia and attempts to control historical thought. Indeed, his aim in starting Smolny College of Liberal Arts and Sciences was to create a climate of free and open scholarship and to encourage critical thinking.

The Russian government, however, has become increasingly wary of such openness and has begun to propose more repressive legislation. President Vladimir Putin even suggested a law that would punish or imprison anyone who sought to revise or criticize the history of the Stalinist years. Although the law has not been enacted, Putin did set up a commission to review historical publications with the aim of monitoring and censoring those critical of Russia.

Much of the government’s discomfort centers on accounts of World War II. In Russia, Stalin is largely credited with having won the war, and his expansive and deadly repressions are often ignored. The war and Russia’s perceptions of it have become the formative collective experience of the people.

“They feel comfortable with amnesia,” Koposov says from his office in Gilman Hall. “They want to present themselves as the new superpower and continue the myth of the great Russian state. And I’ve learned that you cannot balance imperialistic myths with a model of critical thinking. The regime has more power and influence than the academics.”

Koposov and his wife, Dina Khapaeva, also a professor at Smolny, were among a handful of Russian scholars who defended freedom of historical thought and writing, publishing articles in Russia and in France, and they were warned to stop speaking out. The couple embarked on a three-year leave at the Collegium for Advanced Study in Helsinki, Finland. Tired of the reprimands, Koposov decided to resign as dean of Smolny but return to his position as professor there when his leave was over. But then, Koposov received a phone call from Smolny saying he and his wife had been fired from their jobs as professors. That meant once their work in Helsinki was complete, they would have nowhere to go.

“Nikolay Koposov is an international scholar of the highest standing and repute,” Spiegel says. “And now, because of his and his wife’s engagement in public debates and defense of academic freedom and freedom of expression, they have little chance for returning to a normal professional life in Russia.”

Shortly after Koposov was appointed visiting professor at Johns Hopkins, his wife was named chair of the School of Modern Languages at Georgia Tech. Koposov travels there every other weekend to visit her and their 16-year-old daughter.

Koposov is not optimistic about Russia’s future. “I think things will get worse. I don’t foresee a major crisis, but it’s clear that more repression is coming. I know many businesspeople and educated members of the middle class are leaving the country.”

Spiegel says when universities open their doors to at-risk scholars, students’ academic experiences are enriched. “That’s why his [Koposov’s] class drew 70 students. They love being taught by someone who himself is part of the subject. Having a scholar-at-risk be part of our community doesn’t just make a difference to human rights; it makes a difference to scholarship as well.”

Physics and Astronomy Department Mourns Death of Professor

Professor Zlatko Tesanovic, widely admired as a theoretical condensed matter physicist, died on July 26 of an apparent heart attack. He was 55. Tesanovic’s work primarily concerned high temperature superconductors and related materials. In particular, he worked on the theory and phenomenology of iron- and copper-based high temperature superconductors. He also studied quantum Hall effects and other manifestations of strong correlations and emergent behavior in quantum many-particle systems.

“Zlatko was an academic leader here,” says Katherine Newman, dean of the Krieger School of Arts and Sciences. “He was a man of great conviction, born of respect for his colleagues and for the university itself. He will be greatly missed.”

Tesanovic, born in Sarajevo in what was then Yugoslavia, earned an undergraduate degree in physics from the University of Sarajevo. He then received a Fulbright Fellowship and attended the University of Minnesota, where he earned a doctorate in physics in 1985. The National Science Foundation awarded him a postdoctoral fellowship that enabled him to conduct research at Harvard University for two years.

He was hired as an assistant professor at the Krieger School in 1987, but delayed his arrival in order to conduct research at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Tesanovic was promoted to associate professor in 1990 and to full professor with tenure in 1994.

“Zlatko was a brilliant colleague and a leader in the department,” says Daniel Reich, professor and chair of the department. “He was always doing whatever he could to attract good graduate students and faculty. He held his students to high standards, and they in turn held great admiration for him. Zlatko also had a great sense of humor. His death is a huge loss for us.”

Tesanovic published more than 125 papers, and his work was regularly supported by grants from the Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation. He was the recipient of many academic honors, including a David and Lucile Packard Foundation fellowship. He is survived by his wife, Ina Sarcevic, a professor of physics at the University of Arizona; his daughter, Rachel Sarcevic-Tesanovic, who will graduate from the Krieger School in May; and his sister, Mirjana Tesanovic.

Italy’s Gatekeeper of the Humanities

“What I’ve come to appreciate most is precisely this: how much the arts and humanities can help each other.”

—Christopher Celenza

Historian and Latinist Christopher Celenza first traveled to the American Academy in Rome in 1993 to study the nearly forgotten philosophers of the Italian Renaissance. He returned in 2010 as the 21st director of the 118-year-old institution, and says the experience is giving him a new view of how the arts and humanities intersect.

The academy is the United States’ oldest center for independent art and humanities research based outside the country. The architects and artists who helped transform Chicago into the host of the 1893 World’s Columbian Exposition founded the academy in 1894 as a place where artists and scholars could study in a classical setting. Today the institution awards its Rome Prize fellowships to 30 artists and academics each year, inviting them to stay at the academy to take advantage of its 17th-century Villa Aurelia, library, photo archive, gardens, and proximity to Rome’s historical and cultural institutions.

Christopher Celenza directs the American Academy in Rome.

Christopher Celenza directs the American Academy in Rome.

Bringing together painters, sculptors, composers, landscape architects, writers, and preservationists with scholars of history, archaeology, literature, and philosophy provides a unique opportunity for exchange, says Celenza, who was a Rome Prize fellow in 1993–94. As director, he says, “What I’ve come to appreciate most is precisely this: how much the arts and humanities can help each other.”

That emphasis on interdisciplinary work makes the American Academy in Rome quite similar to Johns Hopkins, Celenza notes. “There’s a vibe at Hopkins where you’re really encouraged to reach out to other departments and to work across disciplinary lines.”

As the academy’s director, Celenza, the Charles Homer Haskins Professor in the Department of German and Romance Languages and Literatures, is responsible for fostering such relationships. But one of his most important roles is to be the academy’s ambassador to the rest of Rome and to ensure the organization is a “good cultural citizen” to the Eternal City.

To fulfill that goal, Celenza created a program called “Conversations That Matter,” which invites a panel of experts to discuss issues relevant to the academy’s specialized fields. Last fall, for example, he brought together an archaeologist, the director-general of the UN’s International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property, and a cultural resources manager in the U.S. military to discuss the challenges of preserving cultural heritage threatened by conflict, wars, and natural disasters. Last spring, two local journalists, a historian, and an anthropologist highlighted the cultural, political, and economic issues facing Italy today, such as changes in labor laws, the economic crisis, and political corruption.

Given the storied reputation the humanities enjoy at Johns Hopkins, it’s not surprising that the academy found its current director at the university. “When you look at the history of humanities at Johns Hopkins, we’ve always been small but very selective,” Celenza says. “The university has a legacy of titanic figures in the history of scholarship.”

When Celenza returns to Johns Hopkins in 2014, he hopes his experience in Italy will allow him to facilitate study-abroad programs and collaborations with European universities.

“It’s interesting being here at a time of great change in Italy’s modern culture,” Celenza says. “Italy’s turning out to be one of the key links in the chain in Europe during a time that will be looked at as a period of true historical importance—an extended historical moment that will answer the question whether Europe survives as an economic and political union.”

Hopkins Symphony Orchestra Turns 30

I was intrigued to read about the Hopkins Symphony Orchestra’s 30th anniversary [Spring 2012]. When I was an undergraduate in the early 1960s, I played cello in the “Hopkins Orchestra.” I particularly remember our performance of the Chopin Piano Concerto #1, in which the pianist missed a few entrances, but the skill of the conductor kept the piece on track. In light of my participation in that orchestra back in the ’60s, which similarly included students, faculty, and community members, how do you explain that the orchestra is celebrating only 30 years of existence?

David L. Terzian ’67

Editor’s Note: Various incarnations of an orchestra on campus occurred prior to 1980, including a Goucher-Hopkins Orchestra in the 1970s and a group called Hopkins Orchestra. The Goucher-Hopkins Orchestra disbanded in 1978, and the Hopkins Symphony Orchestra relaunched in 1982 with consistent administrative and school support, resulting in the orchestra we have now.

A&S Online Magazine

The A&S online magazine is spectacular, beautiful, well-written, and extremely user friendly. I am very proud to be a graduate of the writing program and now have something else to brag about—your online magazine. These stories will have HUGE audiences via Twitter—from me, at least. Congratulations to all.

Ann Davenport ’05, Olmué, Chile

Forging Connections Among Muslims

“When you think about Muslims, you typically think of an Arab or South Asian, but if you were to take a random Muslim out of America, odds are they would be black,” says Rafee Al-Mansur. “African-Americans are the largest Muslim racial group in the U.S., at more than a third of the Muslim-American population, but most people don’t seem to realize it—including other Muslims.”

As part of their Woodrow Wilson fellowships, Al-Mansur, a senior sociology major, and classmate Mohamed Hamouda, a biology major, are producing a documentary film about African-American and immigrant Muslim communities in the Baltimore region.

Rafee Al-Mansur (left) and Mohamed Hamouda

Rafee Al-Mansur (left) and Mohamed Hamouda ’13 work on editing their film about Muslims.

 

The two communities tend to exist in their own separate worlds, note Al-Mansur and Hamouda, with African-American mosques mainly located in the city and immigrants—and their mosques—in the suburbs. They share the same religious beliefs, but like many separate ethnic groups, tend to keep to themselves. “I don’t think the immigrants really know how to relate to the African-American community,” says Hamouda. “I don’t think it stems from racism, it’s just a cultural thing. Jokes that are funny to them might not be funny to the other group and vice versa.”

Al-Mansur and Hamouda hope their documentary helps change that paradigm. The pair has been filming interviews with both African-American and immigrant Muslims, getting interviewees—from religious leaders to teenagers—to talk about their respective communities. They’ve had subjects share stories about topics ranging from family life to jobs to relationships to the histories of the communities themselves. Their goal is to edit all the interviews into a film that reveals the dynamics of each community. Then the Wilson fellows would like to screen the film for both groups, with the purpose of helping each one understand the other a little better. “Hopefully,” says Al-Mansur, “we’ll also be able to facilitate some connections between the two. Our ultimate goal is to inspire change, not just to do research.”

Both students are second-generation immigrants. Al-Mansur’s parents hail from Bangladesh, and Hamouda’s mother and father come from Algeria and Libya, respectively. Part of the film, the students say, will cover their own journey of discovery as they complete the project. Despite being the child of immigrants, Al-Mansur says he’s found that, in many ways, he can relate to African-American Muslims more than he can to the first-generation immigrants. “I grew up here in America and have experienced a lot of the same things they have,” he says. “I do think that provides hope that maybe second-generation immigrants can bridge the gap between these two communities.”

Both say they were also surprised by the devotion to Islam practiced by African-American Muslim converts—a devotion often stronger than that they witnessed in the immigrant communities, where people are more interested in fitting into American society. “It’s almost like African-Americans are on this journey to becoming Muslims, and immigrant Muslims are on this journey to becoming American,” says Al-Mansur. “But both communities can offer each other a lot. African-Americans are American. They know this country the best and could help immigrant communities with assimilating into America. At the same time, these immigrant Muslims have a lot of knowledge about Islam they can share with black Muslims.”

Both students say it will take time to help unite two disparate groups facing very different challenges. “When we go to these mosques in each community, we can see that the Friday congregational sermons are very different,” says Hamouda. “The needs of an inner-city teenager facing the problems of gangs or drugs can be very different from those of an immigrant teenager. They’re in different situations, and they have to combat different struggles.” But in the end, he says, “what holds us together is that we all testify to the same Islamic declaration of faith: There is no god but God, and Muhammad (peace and blessings be upon him) is His messenger.”

Mapping Out Global Health Care Systems

How do socioeconomic conditions affect life expectancy? Do people in countries with nationalized medicine live longer? How does happiness affect one’s lifespan? Does aid provided to developing nations really help in lengthening people’s lives?

These were some of the questions Omar Haque set out to explore as part of his Woodrow Wilson Fellowship project. The senior pre-med student has spent much of the past year studying the effect of economic forces on human life expectancy by traveling throughout England, France, South Africa, and Greece. Later this year, he plans to visit Japan and Singapore.

“I wanted to see if there were socioeconomic reasons why people live longer, so I chose countries that ran the spectrum of the health care system—from European countries with socialized medicine to South Africa, which has a large income disparity,” he says.

Haque says that while it’s long been apparent that people in the richest countries live longer than those in the poorest countries, that’s not due to the amount of money spent on health care. For instance, he notes, life expectancy is higher in Great Britain and France than it is in the United States, even though the U.S. spends the most money on health care in the world.

Being a pre-med student, Haque wanted to visit the countries he was researching in order to observe their health care systems firsthand. As part of his qualitative study, in each country Haque familiarized himself with the economics of health care delivery—how doctors get paid, how medical funds are allocated, and how health insurance practices are carried out—while also interviewing college professors, students, and other locals about their country’s economies and health care systems.

While studying the economics of global health care at Oxford University, Haque found that doctors in the U.K. usually work for a salary, versus the fee-for-service system used in the United States. There are advantages and disadvantages to both systems, Haque notes: long waiting lists to see doctors in Britain, who tend to request far fewer tests than their colleagues in the United States, where physicians get paid according to the number of tests they conduct.

“The theory behind fee-for-service in the U.S. is that you’ll conduct a lot of tests to cover all your bases and the patient will get better. But the problem with that theory is that it doesn’t affect life expectancy,” says Haque, referring to work done under Maria Alva Chiola of Oxford’s Health Economic Research Center, with whom he studied. “More lives are lost because of lack of access to health care than [because of] a test that isn’t conducted,” he says.

Haque also delved into the work of National Geographic writer Dan Buettner, who has identified “Blue Zones” around the world—places that have the greatest life expectancy and where more people reach age 100 than anywhere else. Haque learned that access to expensive medical treatments had little to do with extended life expectancy. Instead, he says, living longer has more to do with family ties, a strong belief in something, living your life with a purpose, and a healthy amount of exercise. “These are not normally things you associate with living long; you associate them with being happy,” he says. “But the two are very closely linked.”

When he traveled to South Africa, Haque saw firsthand how violence, a lack of doctors, and high rates of HIV contribute to the country’s average life expectancy of 49.3, according to United Nations data. And he learned that despite years of foreign aid to help combat HIV, the disease is still spreading.

In South Africa, Haque conducted a series of conversations with Ruthira Naraidoo, a professor in the Department of Economics at the University of Pretoria.

Both she and Haque advocate establishing micro-level, community-based health programs where economic and cultural subtleties can be addressed. “We need to leave our desks and gather information on how these places work,” he says. “Only by being there can you learn how to help.”

Haque hopes to earn a medical degree from Hopkins and possibly work for a global health organization, like Doctors Without Borders or the World Health Organization.

“I want to make a difference in people’s lives,” he says. “I want to improve health care in the U.S. and around the world.”

The Gilman Years — Before Johns Hopkins

Is there a Johns Hopkins student who hasn’t heard of Daniel Coit Gilman? The university’s notable first president has campus buildings and awards named for him. His image, cast in bronze, flanks the front entrance of Shriver Hall, and his role in bringing the German university model to America is a story that is a crucial part of the university’s lore. “At Hopkins,” says Kevin Chun ’12, who wrote his senior thesis on Gilman, “Gilman is a hero.”

Even before he had begun his research, Chun, a recipient of the A.J.R. Russell-Wood Undergraduate Research Award in history (one of the Dean’s Undergraduate Research Awards), knew that choosing to write a thesis on someone as well-known and well-documented as Gilman was going to be a challenge because it would be hard to find something new to say. But Chun was fascinated by the man after taking a course on the German research university, taught by his eventual thesis adviser, Rochelle Tobias, a professor in the Department of German and Romance Languages and Literatures, in his junior year and knew there had to be some aspect of Gilman that hadn’t been analyzed. His initial research, Chun says, was all about “trying to find a gap in the field that no one had written about.” After some searching, Chun found an unexplored topic: Gilman’s professional life as the president of the University of California, a position he held from 1872 to 1875, before his presidency at Johns Hopkins.

Kevin Chun

Kevin Chun ’12 uncovered little-known facts about Johns Hopkins’ first president.

The University of California job was a pivotal experience in the evolution of Gilman’s philosophy of higher education, explains Chun. At Berkeley, Gilman “wanted to try a comprehensive university model with a focus on undergraduate education as the center of the university,” says Chun. But Gilman faced stringent opposition from university faculty who championed practical programs like agriculture for a public institution. He left Berkeley filled with self-doubt about his abilities as an educational leader after becoming embroiled in acrimonious university politics.

“I realized that no one had really looked at this part of Gilman’s life before because it was considered a failure, and no one wanted to acknowledge that,” says Chun. Still, Chun contends, the setback at Berkeley laid the groundwork for the educational model Gilman created at Hopkins.

Chun used a variety of archived sources at Berkeley (a trip made possible by award funding) including biographies, speeches, newspaper articles, even congressional testimony to fill in the details of Gilman’s pre-Hopkins career, but he found some of the most compelling narratives in Gilman’s personal letters. In one, Chun recalls, one of Gilman’s mentees writes to Gilman noting his “horrendous experience at Berkeley.” In another, Gilman tells Andrew Dixon White, a friend and the president of Cornell University, that the debacle at Berkeley was “agonizing” and that he was apprehensive of further conflict in university administration. “I read these agonizing thoughts he shared with his friends,” says Chun, “and I realized how human and how fragile he was to show his raw emotion.”

Tobias, Chun’s adviser, points out that this kind of insight reflects Chun’s growth as a researcher. “Kevin already had a sharp, analytical mind when he began this project,” Tobias says. “Over the course of the thesis, however, he also became a gifted writer and a compelling storyteller. He put the pieces of the puzzle together in an original and convincing narrative.”

It’s that storytelling that led Chun to add history as part of a double major with public health. “I’ve always liked history, ever since I was little,” says Chun, who just entered medical school at the University of Maryland. “I liked how concrete and real it is. I like stories.”

Chun sees a connection with his thesis research and his future area of specialization, health policy. “Majoring in history really does help teach you how to interact with people and how to be a good leader,” says Chun. “And Daniel Coit Gilman was a great leader.”

Con Men Characters of American Literature

“I believe the name ‘Hop-Frog’ was not given to the dwarf by his sponsors at baptism,” Edgar Allan Poe begins.

The protagonist and title character of Poe’s 1850 short story was given his name by a cruel king and his court. Their jester Hop-Frog was the butt of every joke, teased relentlessly about his body, forced to drink wine and wear ridiculous costumes. But then, on what seemed like any other evening of royal excess, Hop-Frog fooled the king and his ministers with his clever wit and—long story short—burned them all alive. “This is my last jest,” he declares, seconds before “his fiery revenge” on the king.

Illustration of Benjamin Franklin, Edgar Allen Poe, Mark Twain, and Fitzgerald

Illustration by John S. Dykes

Classic Poe, one might say… as improbable as it is macabre. But to the well-trained student of literature, one might add: classic 19th-century American.

“I’ve always been fascinated with confidence games and con men,” says Doug Tye, a graduate student in the Department of English and the instructor of the course Social Climbers and Charlatans in American Literature. Tye’s father, a motivational speaker from the Midwest, sparked his son’s curiosity at an early age. “I’m interested in the practice of selling ideas that ‘make you better’… selling a product that doesn’t really exist,” he says. “That’s all tied up in this rags to riches American ideal that leads people to think they can be self-made, from nothing to something.”

That’s also the impetus for Tye’s course: connecting great authors of 19th- to early 20th-century American literature through common themes of rapid social mobility and dubious self-representation. Franklin, Emerson, Thoreau, Poe, Barnum, Twain, and Fitzgerald were all too aware of “the tensions between individual achievement and democratic egalitarianism,” Tye explains. Authors of this period routinely cast their protagonists as self-made, often to a nearly impossible extreme—like the social mobility of Twain’s African-American characters or the rise and fall of Jay Gatsby.

“The biggest thing I want is for students to read a small collection of classic American works,” says Tye. “But they should also see these themes of self-making and self-fashioning, and think about the ways that the character’s cons can be seen as artifice and the ways they can be seen as genuine invention.”

Tye is one of 27 Dean’s Teaching Fellows for the fall semester. They were selected in a competitive grant process within the Krieger School, whereby doctoral students are chosen to teach a course of their design during their most advanced years of study at Johns Hopkins. These soon-to-be professors are given the opportunity to lead small seminars on the very subject that interests them the most, while undergraduates have the pleasure of working closely with a scholar. “This is the fellowship every advanced grad student wants to get,” says Tye, who taught four semesters of Expository Writing and submitted an extensive curriculum and lesson plan in order to garner this fellowship.

“Tye has a very interesting take on the subject matter he covers in class,” says Adam Dec ’15, who took one of Tye’s courses in his freshman year and is currently enrolled in Social Climbers and Charlatans in American Literature. “He takes apart every single detail, analyzes the material so well, and really tries to get everyone involved.”

Surely the irony is not lost on Tye: Like his 19th-century protagonists, he’s also in the business of selling intangible ideas and explanations to his students. “Not all confidence games are crimes,” he’s quick to add. “Sometimes it’s just two people who agree on something and they both get what they want.”

Tye’s class, which is one of eight Dean’s Teaching Fellowship courses that have been waitlisted this semester because of student demand, seems to be precisely what Hopkins undergraduates want.